My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP34514
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP34514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:11:27 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/18/1996
Doc Name
1994 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT PN C-81-071
Annual Report Year
1994
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Permit C-81-071 1994 Annual Hydrology Report <br />• manganese to Foidel Creek, the level at Station 8 is still below the total recoverable standard of <br />1000 ug/I for Foidel Creek. Historically, high total recoverable manganese also has been <br />recorded in the upstream station (14), indicating that these values are also attributable to non- <br />mining related causes. <br />The dissolved solids concentrations in the upstream station of Fish Creek (16) are generally <br />slightly lower than those in the downstream station (1002). There is also a slight downstream <br />trend of increasing sodium and sulfate concentrations while calcium, magnesium and <br />bicarbonate concentrations remain fairly consistent. The proportionally higher sodium <br />concentrations over calcium and magnesium leads to a slight downstream increase in SAR. <br />These major ion changes are more apparent during the low-flow period. The increase in TDS <br />could be caused to some extent by evapotransporative effects, but this would not account for <br />the major ion changes. These changes are more likely attributable to discharges of waters <br />having higher sodium and sulfate concentrations than the Fish Creek water. One source of <br />such discharge is the spoil runoff and springs associated with Mine 2. However, the very low <br />flows associated with the Mine 2 disturbed areas indicates minimal influence from this source. <br />The primary source of such water at this time is the underground mine discharge point located <br />near Mine 2. <br />Since 1987, except for a short period during 1990, the salt content of Trout Creek below Middle <br />Creek has been consistently higher than above Middle Creek. Typically, there is approximately <br />100 to 200 umhos/cm increase in field conductivity over this reach. The downstream increase <br />was apparent during the spring runoff period. The Trout Creek salt content increases during <br />• the spring runoff. This is probably due to the effects of Middle Creek flows that have a higher <br />salt content than Trout Creek primarily as a result of Foidel Creek which flows into Middle <br />Creek just upgradient of the Trout Creek confluence. Foidel Creek salt loads during the Spring <br />runoff are primarily due to the impact of surface mine discharges. However, the Trout Creek <br />salt content increase has not caused material damage, nor is there any increase in trace metal <br />levels. <br />SPOIL SPRING MONITORING <br />A spoil spring monitoring program was initiated in 1986 and will be conducted annually until <br />such time as the monitoring requirement is eliminated. According to the approved plan, the <br />annual mine-wide survey is conducted during May, and springs are measured for flow and field <br />parameters. If a spring is discharging 35 gallons per minute or greater than it is monitored <br />throughout the remainder of the year in accordance with the monitoring plan. <br />Flow <br />The field data of the 1994 spoil spring monitoring program is presented on Table 47. A plot of <br />the historic flow data for Station 114 is presented on Figure 43. Due to pumping of Site 114 for <br />supply water by Twentymile Coal Company, the spoil spring did not discharge for the 1994 <br />water year. No significant spoil springs were observed at Mine 2. The flow data indicates that <br />• the spoil springs follow the same pattern as the surface runoff: very low flow during most of the <br />EP4TEXT.DOC 07/17/97 Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.