My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP34380
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP34380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:11:12 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:48:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/30/1999
Doc Name
1998 REVEGETATION MONITORING REPORT
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• importance of both the previous 4 months' and 6 months' precipitation were <br />the most influential. 1998 data for cumulative prior 6 months place it as the <br />second driest of the six year, period (Figure 3). Consideration of the previous 4 <br />months cumulative moisture similarly places 1998 somewhat below the middle <br />of the range of variation over the past six years. Figure 5 indicates that while <br />1997 was a very cool year, distinctly cooler than any year since 1986, 1998 <br />was more nearly average. In general, cool temperatures would be expected to <br />ameliorate any deficiency in precipitation by lowering evapotranspiration. Also, <br />in general, cool temperatures can be expected to enhance productivity of the <br />primarily cool-season plant cover in both reclaimed and native areas. <br /> Over the period of observation at the Seneca II-W Mine, total vegetation cover <br /> in the 1991/1993 reclamation area was 54.8, 32.5, 45.9, .and 30.5 percent in <br /> 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998, respectively. When examined from the <br />• <br /> standpoint of what climatic indices seemed to have correlated most closely <br /> between total vegetation cover at the Seneca II-W Mine and the favorable <br /> growing conditions of 1995, 1996 and 1997, it would appear that the Total <br /> Precipitation for the Previous 6 months (Figure 3) or the Total Precipitation for <br /> the Previous 4 Months (Figure 4) were better predictors than the Total <br /> Precipitation for the Previous 12 Months (Figure 2). Both .Figures 3 and 4 <br /> showed that 1995 was greatly superior to other years and this corresponds <br /> to the extremely high levels of vegetation growth that were observed in 1995. <br /> 1996 shows up as somewhat less favorable (previous 6 months, Figure 3) or <br /> considerably less favorable (previous 4 months, Figure 4). 1997 approached <br /> 1995 on previous 6 months graph (Figure 3) and is second only to 1995 on the <br /> previous 4 months graph (Figure 4). The observed drop in cover in 1996 and <br /> its rise again in 1997 would appear to support the importance of both the <br />• previous 4 months' and 6 months' precipitation were the most influential. Cool <br />L4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.