My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP34115
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP34115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:10:48 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:45:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/14/1995
Doc Name
SAN LUIS MINE PHASE II RAISE 2 DESIGN REPORT VOLUME I OF II
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />San Luis Mine Phase II, Raise 2 Design Report <br />' referred to as apost-earthquake stability analysis and is advocated by numerous authorities on <br />earthquake stability of dams and embankments (Finn, 1982; Seed, 1987; Lo and Klohn, 1990; <br />Marcuson, Hynes and Franklin, 1990; and Ishihara, 1993). <br />' With this type of analysis, the structure's stability is evaluated for static loading conditions with <br />' post-liquefaction residual strengths to determine if the driving forces exceed the resisting forces. <br />If this is not the case, a flow slide can not occur and the structure is determined to be stable. Phis <br />method assumes that the dam or embankment will be safely able to tolerate the limited deformations <br />' which occur during the earthquake shaking. For the San Luis tailings facility the post-earthquake <br />stability analysis method predicts a large factor of safety against a flow slide as indicated by the <br />' relatively large yield accelerations, i.e. inertia forces, which are required to reduce the factor of <br />safety to 1.0 for post-liquefaction conditions. <br />' It should also be clearly understood that the probability of the MCE event occurring is very low. <br />Based on Dr. Glass' estimates of probability presented in the Permit, there is a 0.1 to 2.5 percent <br />' probability that 0.6g PGA could be experienced at the site in the next 20 years. <br />Construction of the dam raise will include establishing survey control points along the crest of the <br />' raise and existing embartlnttent as well as various locations on the downstream face. Following any <br />large earthquakes in the area, these survey points can be utilized to determine if any deformation <br />_ of the structure has occurred. This will provide a basis for determining the extent, if any, of <br />' damage to the structure, and although unlikely, the need for remedial action. 'litre dam should also <br />be inspected by a qualified geotechnical engineer for any signs of cracking, increased seepage, and <br />' slope instability or bulging. <br />' Long term stability of the structure will increase as time goes by as the tailings consolidate. <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />~ Y 5.2 ro~ect o. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.