My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP34115
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP34115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:10:48 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:45:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/14/1995
Doc Name
SAN LUIS MINE PHASE II RAISE 2 DESIGN REPORT VOLUME I OF II
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />' San Luis Mine Phase II. Raise 2 Design Repon <br />' drilled adjacent to CPT probes at the three locations to provide tailings samples for positive <br />identification and verification of material types. The continuous tailings samples were obtained <br />through the use of a split spoon sampler and penetration test data was also collected for correlation <br />' to the CPT data. <br />' In order to collect a larger sample volume, a 3-inch O.D. split spoon sampler rather than the <br />Standard Penetration Test (SPT) 2-inch sampler (ASTM D-1586) was utilized. Research on the <br />mechanics of the SPT sampling process by Schmertmann (1979a and 1979b) indicated that the <br />' increase in SPT blow counts associated with the use of the larger diameter sampler would be offset <br />by not using liner sleeves in the sampler and the blow count data obtained could be considered <br />' equivalent to the SPT N-value. The sampler was driven in 24 increments using an automatic trip <br />hammer system. The sampling rods consisted of pin-connected hex rods. <br />An integrated electronic energy calibration system was incorporated into the sampling program to <br />calculate the actual energy delivered to the sampler. This data was used to convert the raw blow <br />' count data (N-value) to Nom-values (blow count obtained using 60 percent of theoretical energy). <br />The calculated energies were quite low (typically 30 to 40 percent) for the hammer system employed <br />when compared to published results (Seed, et. a1.,1984; Skempton, 1986; and Farrar, 1991). It is <br />' believed that the abnormally low energy delivered to the sampler was due to the use of the pin- <br />connected rather than threaded rods. Comparison of the corrected auger boring blow count data <br />with the equivalent (N,)~ values derived from the CPT data indicated that the (N,)~ values for the <br />' . auger borings were much lower. Due to the uncertainty associated with the use of the 3-inch <br />sampler and pin-connected rods, no further corrections or correlations were attempted with this data. <br />The drive samples provided continuous samples of the tailings for visual classification and laboratory <br />' testing. The samples revealed that the tailings investigated consist primarily of the tailings sand <br />fractions or tailings sand with thin layers of slimes (typically 1/16 to 1/2 inch thick) and occasional <br />discrete slimes layers up to 2 ft thick, thereby cortfirming the general distribution of material types <br />' identified in the CPT testing program. Due to sample disturbance it was not passible to accurately <br />determine which samples represented saturated tailings. As was the case for twinned CPT probes, <br />' little direct correlation between the auger borings and adjacent CPT probes was possible due to the <br />frequent large lateral variations in material types. <br />' The drill logs for the auger borings are contained in Appendix B.3. Details of the laboratory testing <br />program are presented in Section 2.5. <br />1 <br /> <br />u Y 2-6 rorect o. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.