My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP34115
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP34115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:10:48 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:45:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/14/1995
Doc Name
SAN LUIS MINE PHASE II RAISE 2 DESIGN REPORT VOLUME I OF II
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />t <br />San Luis Mine Phase Q, Raise 2 Design Repon <br />' Table 1 presents a summary of the depth to saturated tailings at each of the probe locations as <br />determined from the residual pore pressure data. As shown in this table, the level of tailings <br />saturation increases with increased distance from the embanlonent. For locations approximately 80 <br />' ft from the crest of Raise 1 ("C" locations), the average depth to saturated tailings is 32.5 ft <br />(approximately 8566.1 ft elevation). For locations 125 ft from the crest of Raise 1 ("B" locations), <br />' the average depth to saturated tailings is 26.1 ft (approximately 8571.8 ft elevation). For locations <br />175 ft from the crest of Raise 1 ("A" locations), the average depth to saturated tailings is 22.5 ft <br />(approximately 8574.9 ft elevation). <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />'' <br />TABLE 1 <br />DEPTH TO SATURATED TAILINGS <br />CPT PROBE DEPTH (ft) CPT PROBE DEPTH (ft) <br />lA 17.2 3A1 22.8 <br />1B1 24.9 3A2 24.6 <br />1B2 25.1 3B 27.1 <br />1C > 27.2 3C 31.3 <br />2A1 20.5 4A1 25.9 <br />2A2 21.0 4A2 25.4 <br />2B 25.8 4B 27.4 <br />2C 31.0 4C 35.3 <br />' Below the initial level of saturation the tailings typically remain saturated but exhibit residual pore <br />pressures which are generally less than hydrostatic. This is due to the underdrain system in the <br />impoundment, and drainage provided by the embanlonent itself, which creates downward seepage <br />gradients. This effect becomes more pronounced with depth. <br />' As a typical example, Figure 3 presents a plot of residual pore pressure versus depth for CPT-2B. <br />As shown on this figure the residual pore pressures are zero or slightly negative down to a depth <br />of 24.8 ft (7.55 m). At 28.1 ft (8.55 m) a residual pore pressure of 1.0 psi (0.7 m) was recorded <br />' which would indicate an equivalent static water level of 25.8 ft (7.85 m) and a corresponding line <br />indicating normal hydrostatic pressure below this level is included on the figure. As shown, the <br />tailings down to a depth of 41.2 ft (12.55 m) exhibit near hydrostatic residual pore pressures. <br />Below this depth the tailings exhibit residual pore pressures which deviate increasingly from <br />hydrostatic pressure with depth. <br />' The dynamic and residual pore pressure data indicates that the tailings are generally contractive <br />' during shear exhibiting positive excess pore pressures during advance of the probe. However, <br />o Y 2-3 ro~ect o. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.