My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-06-13_REPORT - M1981302 (11)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1981302
>
1997-06-13_REPORT - M1981302 (11)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2022 3:19:17 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:37:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981302
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/13/1997
From
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR
To
TE/UTE LADIES TRESSES COVERY PLAN
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. . v <br /> of recommended Riparian Management Objectives and Standards and Guidelines <br /> is expected. <br /> 7. Monitoring Strategy for the Ute ladies'-tresses. Monitoring must be <br /> designed to provide information on the recovery status of the Ute ladies'- <br /> tresses in Kay Watersheds. Results of monitoring should enable managers <br /> to see whether or not orchids are achieving and maintaining desired <br /> distribution, population size, and viability. Monitoring the <br /> effectiveness of the Ute ladies'-tresses Standards and Guidelines will <br /> also be needed. If monitoring shows that they have been ineffective, <br /> they should be revised. (Task 1 .8) <br /> There are three types of monitoring in this recovery strategy that should <br /> be initiated prior to changes in management, and done concurrently <br /> throughout the range of the Ute ladies'-tresses. Monitoring objectives, <br /> methods, and reporting should be consistent in all watersheds. The ID <br /> Teams will be responsible for making sure that monitoring is being <br /> conducted and for evaluating the results. The three types of monitoring <br /> include: <br /> a. Population distribution and status (presence-absence and baseline <br /> condition) . <br /> b. Effectiveness of the orchid Standards and Guidelines, RMOs, and RHCAs <br /> (implementation, compliance, and habitat response) . <br /> c. Effectiveness of recovery efforts (population response) . <br /> 8. Orchid Recovery in Disiunct Habitats. The above strategy for orchid <br /> recovery focuses on orchid occurrences associated with stream systems that <br /> are in some way still naturally functioning. The Ute ladies'-tresses <br /> orchid also occurs around natural seeps and springs and in wet meadows, <br /> only some of which are associated with historic alluvial systems. Human- <br /> induced habitat management that mimics natural conditions appears to be <br /> important for maintaining or enhancing some of these populations. For <br /> example, appropriate hydrology can be created by irrigation, and <br /> vegetation community characteristics can be sustained by haying or <br /> grazing. The scope of the recovery effort must also include protection <br /> and management of these occurrences associated with wet meadows, seeps, <br /> and springs. Approximately 50% of the known population occurs in such <br /> settings. Recovery objectives for populations in disjunct habitats <br /> include: <br /> a. Securing habitat and habitat conditions necessary to perpetuate the <br /> orchid: <br /> 1) purchase, easements, management agreements, special land <br /> management designations, etc. ; <br /> 2) purchase or obtain water rights and water delivery systems <br /> sufficient to maintain hydrologic requirements. <br /> 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.