Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii <br />,. _ <br />BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD COMPANY ~'', 9~ ° - <br />February 8, 1993 <br />FE92 199 <br />Mr. Larry Oehler ~~' ~ ~,~, <br />Division of Minerals and Geology I\AINER:~L.. at ~ <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 GOLD COMP <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: Battle Mountain Resources, Inc. - San Luis Project ~~ <br />DMG Permit No. M-88-112, TR-010 ~ `I/ ,q3 <br />weekly Pond Compliance Report ti~\~ <br />January 31 - February 6, 1993 <br />Dear Mr. Oehler: <br />Attached is a sunLmaiy of the daily un-site cyanide 8nalysis <br />performed on samples from the active (upper) pond a>7d the <br />collection pond during the week of January 31-February 6, 1993 <br />as required by the approved TR-010. <br />The active (upper) pond averaged 1.57 ppm CN-wad and 3.29 ppm <br />CN-total. The collection pond averaged 1.17 ppm CN-wad <br />and 1.97 ppm CN-total. The weekly sample of the indctive <br />(lower) pond, collected on February 3, showed 1.78 ppm CN-wad <br />and 2.66 ppm CN-total. I <br />As reported to you during our telephone conversatioil on <br />February 5, the February 3 active pond sample showed 4.84 pom~~j <br />CN-tot The daily sample of the active pond on February 4 <br />s owed 2.49 ppm CN-total. A contaminated sample bottle or a <br />titration error is the expected reason for the February 3 <br />sample results. Sample results bracketing February 3 were <br />within permit standards. All CN-wad results were within <br />permit standards. The February 3 result was included in the <br />weekly average calculations. <br />On February 6, the collection pond was not sampled by the <br />weekend mill crew. <br />If you have any questions, please call. <br />Sincerely, <br />ono d <br />Alana L. Scott <br />Environmental Engineer <br />Enclosures <br />cc: Anne Baldrige <br />Ken Kluksdahl <br />Mike Young <br />PO. BOX 310 SAN LUIS, COLORADO 81152-0310 (719) 672-3362 FAX (719) 672-3363 <br />