My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP33519
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP33519
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:09:56 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:32:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/21/1994
Doc Name
1993 ANNUAL HYDROLOGIC REPORT MUNGER AND MCCLANE CANYON MINES
From
GRAND VALLEY COAL CO
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
1993
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Source of Water Inflow <br />• As detailed in previous reports, the water flowing into the mine <br />seems to be a mix of water infiltrating the graben along the faults <br />and water in the coal seam. The zone of saturation of the coal seam <br />was initially estimated using the results of exploration drilling. <br />The drilling indicated that holes in the McClane graben were dry; <br />specifically, holes 7-15-3 and 7-21-1. Additionally, a piezometer <br />installed downdip from the mine outside of the graben has not <br />realized water to date. Since the well is down-dip and is dry it is <br />surmised that the water flowing into the mine is from a perched <br />aquifer in the area of the coal mine. <br />The water within the perched aquifer flowing into the mine probably <br />comes from surface water infiltration along the faults east and west <br />of the mine. Both faults have ephemeral drainages crossing their <br />surface trace near the mine and may receive water from the <br />drainages. The water then infiltrates the coal seam which has <br />become saturated over time. This assumption is supported by the <br />previously documented cyclical nature of water inflow corresponding <br />with periods of precipitation. <br />MUNGBR CANYON MINE <br />To date there has been no water encountered by this mine; therefore, <br />there has been no effect on the hydrologic regime of the area. A <br />current mine workings map is included as Figure 2. Table 1 <br />documents that no water was used at the mine this year. <br />• PRECIPITATION <br />Based upon Bureau of Land Management records from a rain gage in <br />Ashford Canyon, the 1992 water year experienced above average <br />amounts of precipitation. About 25.51 inches of precipitation was <br />Table 2 gives the daily precipitation record for the 1993 water year <br />and Table 3 contains monthly totals since 1977 for the Ashford <br />Canyon site. January with 5.02 inches and February with 4.47 inches <br />were especially wet. If these months had received the their normal <br />precipitation, 3.47 inches, the precipitation for the year would <br />have been nearly identical to the average year, 19.69 inches. The <br />records for the Ashford Canyon rain gage do not give a precise <br />record of the precipitation at the mines. Localized thunderstorms <br />and may only effect one of the many canyons in the area. <br />Two storm events, on October 30, 1992 and March 27, 1993 were in <br />excess of the 10 year 24 hour storm event. Measurements of <br />precipitation at the McClane Mine indicate that these events were <br />also excessive at the mine. The event in October 1992 occurred just <br />after the sedimentation pond had been cleaned and put about five <br />feet of water in the dry pond. This was a short duration nighttime <br />storm and was not sampled. On the weekend of March 27 over 3 inches <br />of rain was measured at the mine site. Since the storm occurred <br />over the weekend, no samples were collected. <br />• <br />Page - 3 1/19/94 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.