Laserfiche WebLink
J. E. STOVER & ASSOCIATES IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />2768 COMPASS DRIVE, SUITE 301 sss <br />GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81506 <br />PHONE: (970) 245-4101, FA% 242-7908 <br />}[INE ENGINEERING CIVIL SNCINEERING <br />MINE RBCLANATION CONSTRUCTION NANAGEIOZNT <br />RECEIVED <br />October 10, 1996 <br />QCT 15 19,86 <br />Bivip~an of Mu)ara~p d ©aelegy <br />Michael P. Boulay <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Re: Bowie Resources Limited - Bowie No. 1 Mine <br />1995 AHR Review <br />Permit C-81-038 <br />Dear Mr. Boulay: <br />The DMG's letter dated October 3, 1996 transmitted its comments on <br />the referenced annual hydrologic report review. Following are <br />Bowie's responses to the DMG's questions and concerns: <br />GENERAL COMMENTS <br />1. No comment required. The DMG's request to have baseline <br />values tabulated in the report is noted and will be complied <br />with where possible and appropriate. <br />The tubes in Drill <br />approximately ~ inch i <br />in water to measure <br />purposes that DH-X is <br />to water is 900 feet. <br />DH-X, the bottom 100 <br />measure depth to Ovate <br />to the tube and the pr <br />measured. The pressu <br />43.3 psi which equate <br />depth to water in DH- <br />holes 60 and 65 are plastic tubes <br />.n diameter. The tubes must be submerged <br />water level. Assume for illustration <br />1500 feet in total depth and its depth <br />If a 1000 foot long tube is placed in <br />feet of tube is submerged in water. To <br />r in the well, compressed gas is hooked <br />essure necessary to evacuate the tube is <br />re to evacuate the tube in this case is <br />s to 100 feet of water. Therefore, the <br />X is 900 feet (1,000 - 100). <br />The water quality information for wells MW-1 - MW-3 is not <br />available. A communications problem with the testing <br />laboratory resulted in the limited full suite analysis for the <br />first quarter samples. <br />AHR COMMENTS <br />1. The DMG notes an apparent discrepancy under Hydrologic Impacts <br />where the mine inflow section of the report indicates <br />virtually no water inflow to the mine. The report further <br />