My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP33317
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP33317
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:09:44 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:28:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/22/2005
Doc Name
2004 Annual Reclamation Report
From
Blue Mountain Energy Inc
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
200A Revegetation Survey <br />Introduction <br />During September and October visual surveys the referenced sites were made. Each site <br />was walked or driven with an ATV to assess the entire site. Observations were then <br />recorded on an inspection form for future reference (see Appendix). The intent of the <br />inspections were to: <br />1. Assess the effectiveness of past revegetation practices. <br />2. Identify potential problems that exist that may warrant further attention. <br />3. Provide insight to future revegetation efforts. <br />4. Provide information needed to develop strategies to correct potential <br />deficiencies. <br />East Portal Area <br />Dry prevailing conditions have limited the maturation of the perennial species. Good <br />grass and shrub growth was noted however many seedlings may be dormant due to the <br />drought. Good shrub and grass establishment was noted primarily in the core area. <br />Excellent establishment was noted within the riprap channels. <br />Drill Sites <br />In general, the reclaimed sites were in good condition. The condition generally reflected <br />the maturity of the site as well as the quality of the soils at the location. Many shrubs and <br />forbs were prominent on many of the sites. Best forb and shrub establishment occurred <br />on harsh sites that had little competition from weeds. However, these harsher sites also <br />produced fewer grasses and less ground cover. Where weed competition was greatest <br />perennial grass seedlings usually persisted in adequate densities. <br />Refuse Area #1 <br />This site continues to be dominated by grasses. Cheatgrass continues to be a problem but <br />perennial grasses appear to be maintaining their hold. The lack of forbs and shrubs may <br />become an issue or may slow the maturation of this site towards Phase III bond release. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.