Laserfiche WebLink
- 19 - <br />only. <br />Several important evaluations can, however, be made <br />from the stability analyses: <br />1. The upper bench and the slope below it appear to <br />to be stable when no ground water is present in <br />the area, even if we assume an unrealistically <br />low shearing resistance of the rocks and soils at <br />the site. It is therefore very probable that ground <br />water was a significant factor contributing to the <br />instability of the area and to the development of <br />the landslides. <br />2. The analyses show that factors of safety of the <br />slope could be close to unity when ground water is <br />present in one of the coal seams or in some other <br />permeable layer of the barren member. <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />3. The analyses of the natural slope with no waste <br />pile above it show that the probability of shallow <br />failures, parallel with the surf ac e, is higher than <br />the probability of deep-seated failures. This con- <br />firms our interpretation of the mechanism of the <br />slides. Relatively shallow failures of the crests <br />of the benches are more probable in the area than <br />deep-seated, large landslides. <br />4. The analyses show a significant increase of factors <br />of safety if the slope is dewatered. If, for instance, <br />we assume a failure plane following the bottom of <br />the F seam and ground water existing within this <br />seam, dewatering of the area increases factors <br />e[aNroao coNw~m+c, wc. <br />