Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. David Berry <br />October 26, 1988 <br />Page 8 <br />CYVCC RESPONSE: <br />The October, 1988 mercury concentration for Well 008-AV-1 was 0.3 ug/1, only <br />slightly above the detection limit of 0.2 ug/1. While the conductivity <br />levels of Well 008-AV-2 did increase in 1987, the dissolved solids <br />concentration did not increase. Therefore, no increasing trend in the <br />dissolved solids load to the alluvial/surface water system as indicated. <br />MLRD CONCERN: <br />Spoil Sorinas <br />Two springs were sampled during the 1986-1987 water year. These exhibited <br />relatively high values for electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids <br />(M3-87-1), sulphate (M3-87-1), silver (M3-87-1), zinc (Mil-87-2), iron and <br />manganese. The suspended solids concentration is relatively high for <br />M3-87-2. We recommend that when samples are collected for low flow sites <br />such as these, the sample should be filtered. This should be documented in <br />the data base to avoid any confusion during the data analysis phase. <br />It is our understanding that the previously identified springs (M3A, MOB, <br />M3C, M3D) were dry during the last water year. Please notify us if this is <br />not correct. <br />CYVCC RESPONSE: <br />The water quality of the springs is consistent with or better than that <br />expected from spoil springs. Care will be taken in the future to minimize <br />suspended solids concentrations of spring samples, although field conditions <br />sometimes make it difficult to prevent suspended solid contamination. This <br />is due to the low flows encountered from the various springs. All <br />parameters indicated as dissolved are from a filtered aliquot of the sample. <br />MLRD CONCERN: <br />Surface Water <br />Three stream sties are monitored; one by CYCC and two by the USGS. As <br />expected, relatively elevated values are reported for electrical <br />conductivity, total dissolved solids, sulphate, iron and manganese. Both <br />station 900 (Foidel Creek) and Station 29 (Middle Creek) may indicate an <br />increasing trend for electrical conductivity. We agree that much of the <br />impact is attributable to the larger mine complex upstream from Mine No. 3. <br />It is also possible that same of the increase may be explained by recent low <br />flows; however, these issues must be examined in greater detail before <br />specific conclusions regarding material damage can be formulated. <br />