Laserfiche WebLink
9/30/93 <br />Responses to Comments <br />San Luis Reclamation Evaluation Report <br />Page 9 <br />the EPA as the appropriate test method for determining the <br />leachability of mine waste materials. The second reason that <br />this method was selected to provide data for comparison to the <br />original tailings materials as required by Abatement }`8. EPA <br />1312 leachability tests were conducted on the original tailings <br />material as discussed in the approved permit and changing <br />analytical methodology at this point would not allow for the <br />required comparison. <br />The U.S. EPA developed the 1312 Method specifically fqr mining <br />type wastes in response to mounting concern by scilentists, <br />industry and regulators alike that other test protocols then <br />currently in use, principally the USEPA 1310 Method EP Toxicity <br />test procedure and the California Assessment Manuhl Waste <br />Extraction Procedure (CAMWET), were unrepresentative of the <br />geochemical conditions in inorganic mining waste systems. <br />Other test protocols, such as the USEPA Method 1310 and 1311 <br />(Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure), use buffered <br />organic leach systems, designed to simulate the type of <br />leaching which might be expected in a sanitary landfill or <br />similar; i.e. an organically controlled chemical envilronment. <br />This is patently not the condition seen in mine waste systems, <br />in general, and is clearly not the case with the San Luis <br />tailings. <br />The EPA 1312 Method requires adjustment of the distilYed water <br />for leaching using a mixture of 60$ laboratory grade sulfuric <br />acid and 40$ laboratory grade nitric acid. These acilds could <br />be present in a tailings system. (Note that BMRI incorrectly <br />identified that a mixture of hydrochloric and nitric acid was <br />used during the September 17th meeting). Accordingly, the <br />choice of EPA Method 1312 is consistent with Federal clnd other <br />states regulatory perception of mine waste leaching and is more <br />realistic and applicable representation of rainwater leaching <br />of tailings than other, organically based leach testing <br />protocols. <br />Leach testing protocols for mining wastes involve agitation of <br />the sample for an 18-24 hour period in a 20 parts licJuid to 1 <br />part solid ratio to attempt to extract as much of the species <br />as possible, irrespective of what might be the field solution <br />kinetics. This type of test is over-robust compared with field <br />conditions in that the tailings will not be shaken for nearly <br />24 hours in a closed container with a high water to solids <br />ratio as they are being leached naturally. Accordingly, the <br />actual concentrations of species seen in the leachate from such <br />