My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP32435
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP32435
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:08:32 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:14:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
2/2/2007
Doc Name
2006 Annual Hydrology Report
From
Blue Mountain Energy, Inc.
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2006
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
compliance with applicable discharge standards. Ouffalls 024 and 026 at the sump <br />dewatering holes have not discharged since the January 1996. <br />2.2.1.7 Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing No WET testing was conducted during <br />the water year since there was no discharge of the underground water from the sump <br />dewatering holes or from ouffall 004 (Pond PP2). A history of WET testing at Deserado <br />Mine follows below: <br />BME started the whole effluent toxicity (WET) testing program beginning in the fourth <br />quarter of 1989. The mine water effluent was found to be toxic to the test species. <br />Accelerated testing was conducted but the toxicity to the species continued. <br />In a meeting with Colorado Water Quality Control Division (WQCD) staff on January 31, <br />1992, the BME staff reiterated the biomonitoring events, and various measures taken to <br />identify the toxicants and to reduce the toxicity. BME took the following steps to identify <br />potential toxicants. <br />• In the early stages of WET testing, the associated HzS in the effluent was <br />deemed to be a potential toxicant. However, a WET testing done by <br />ENSR Consulting in June 1990 after removing HzS by aeration still <br />showed toxicity. This result indicated that some other factor(s) also <br />contributed to the toxicity. <br />• In September, 1990, ENSR Consulting was directed to conduct a "toxicity <br />characterization" study to identify the primary cause of the toxicity. This <br />study considered pH effects, volatile organic carbon, metals chelation, <br />aeration, total dissolved solids (TDS) and ammonia. The lab determined <br />high TDS (chlorides) as the primary cause of the toxicity. However, a <br />recent review shows no correlation between LCso values and chloride or <br />TDS levels. <br />BME took the following measures to reduce toxicity of the effluent. <br />• On-site aeration structures were installed for HZS removal before <br />discharging the efFluent. <br />• A pilot test was conducted to identify a flocculent for removing high levels <br />of oil and grease from the effluent. <br />io <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.