Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the 1995 AHR. A revised water level and flow rate page for the 1993 water year is included as well and <br />should replace the corresponding page in the "Data" section of the 1993 AHR. <br />For well FBR-11-A, Figure 12 (footnoted I:\SPREADSH\AI~R\TCC\TCCFIGI2.RV2) should replace the <br />original Figure 12 submitted with the 1993 AHR.. Figure 5 (footnoted I:\SPREADSH\AHR\TCC\ <br />TCCFIGI2.REV) should replace the original Figure 5 submitted with the 1994 AHR. Lastly, Figure 5 <br />(header WLFBRl IA Chart 3) should replace the original Figure 5 submitted with the 1995 AHR. A <br />revised water level and flow rate page for the 1993 water year is included as well and should replace the <br />corresponding page in the "Data" section of the 1993 AHR. <br />General Comments <br />I. Figures 84 & 85 show a labeling discrepancy on the X axis. Please explain and correct as <br />appropriate. <br />Response: When entering data for these plots, copy and paste steps were employed. The individual <br />entering data did not correct the year from 1993 to 1994. Consequently, there were dates that appeared to <br />be inserted at incottect points on the chart. This has been corrected for both Figures 84 and 85 on the <br />revised espies enclosed. <br />2. Please indicate the units of the values which represent the mine water discharge meter <br />readings. <br />Response: The units of the values for mine water discharge on tables 41b and 42b are gallons. The <br />revised Tables are enclosed. <br />3. Elevation information on Figure 2 is missing for springs 20-14 and 303-1. Please add this <br />information as appropriate. <br />Response: Elevations have been added as requested. Duplicate copies of Figure 2 are enclosed. In <br />addition, a revised copy of Table 36 for the 1994 AHR is included which shows the correct datum <br />elevation. <br />4. Figure 2, Designated Locations, Hydrologic Monitoring Program indicates many stations which <br />are not part of the Foidel Creek hydrologic monitoring program. Please eliminate all non-Foidel <br />Creek stations from Figure 2. <br />Response: Non-Foidel Creek monitoring stations have been removed from Figure 2 per your request. <br />Duplicate copies of Figure 2 are enclosed. <br />Figures 72 and 76 do not report data for the period of record as the annotation on the figure <br />indicate. <br />Response: The sub-headings for Figure 72 and 76 have been revised to correctly reflect the time span <br />for the depicted flow data. The revised figures are enclosed. <br />6. The map inaccurately identifies well 006-88-2 and 006-89-2. Please correct. <br />i:Wocument~ihr~foidetckVccatv.Hr <br />