My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP32383
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP32383
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:08:31 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:12:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
11/27/2000
Doc Name
ECKMAN PARK MINE 1 & 2 C-81-071 1999 ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT RESPONSES
From
DMG
To
COLO YAMPA COAL CO
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. III IIIIIIIIIIIII Ill <br />STATE OF LOLOI~AUv <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St . RWm ? IS <br />Denver, Colorado 80?03 <br />Phone: (3031866-3567 <br />fnX: (307) 83?8106 <br />November 27.2000 <br />Mr. Rick Mills <br />Colorado Yampa Coal Company <br />29587 Routt County Road No. 27 <br />Oak Creek, CO 80467 <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERAL S <br />GEOLOGY <br />R E C L A M A T I O N <br />MINING•SA FE7Y <br />Gil I Owens <br />Cn~ernor <br />GregE Walchrr <br />E.ecw~we D~renu~ <br />Re: Eckman Park, Mine I & 2, C-81-071, 1999 Annual Reclamation Re ort Res onses ^~~~nael e. ronti <br />P P D~~isian Dnearn <br />Dear Mr. Mills: <br />In response to Mr. Steve Miller's telephone conversation with me on Monday November 27, 2000, this letter <br />serves to confirm that the Division has received corrected tables to Colorado Yampa Coal Company's Eckman <br />Park, Mine No. 1 and Mine No. 2's 1999 Annual Hydrology Report (AHR). Colorado Yampa Coal Company <br />adequately addressed item numbers 3 that was noted in the Division's review letters, dated September 6, 2000 and <br />November 16, 2000. The revised Tables 14, ] 5, and 16, dated August 25, 2000, resolve the concern stated below: <br />3. Datum elevations for tables 14, l5, and 16 and their associated graphs are incorrect. Well completion data <br />indicates datum values are 400-500 feet higher than depicted. Corrected tables were received by the Drvrsrorr <br />on August 30, 2000. <br />If you have any other questions, please call, <br />Sincerely, <br />Envil~onmetrtal-Rtotection Specialist <br />1071/1999 ahr3.doc <br />Cc: Dan Hernandez <br />Kent Gorham <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.