My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP32084
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP32084
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:08:15 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:07:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/28/2007
Doc Name
2006 Annual Revegetation Monitoring Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sample locations in reclaimed areas were randomly plotted by use of an internal script routine <br />within ArcView software. Minimum spacing between sample points was 170 feet (one 50 m <br />transect length). The SCC-assigned number of samples for a given parameter in a given area <br />reflected previously experienced sample variability or the level of precision required for that area. <br />In the extended reference areas, each reference unit was gridded and numbered. Grid cell size <br />was 200 feet X 200 feet. These grid cells were placed contiguously by hand on maps of 1:4,800 <br />scale. Sample locations were selected as the center points of grid cells selected using random <br />numbers generated by computer. <br />Sample points were located in the field using topographic maps. Cover and woody plant density <br />transects were located and oriented using a blind throw of a meter stick. The final location of <br />each herbaceous production plot was chosen with a blind throw of the sampling hoop made from <br />the origin of the associated coverlwoody plant density transect. At each cover/woody plant <br />density sampling location, the slope (percent) and aspect of the site were determined and <br />recorded, as was the orientation of the transect (in degrees not corrected for magnetic <br />declination). <br />STATISTICAL METHODS <br />Sample adequacy calculations for parameter estimation were carried out using the formula as <br />prescribed by the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for parameter estimation without <br />hypothesis testing (DMG 1995): <br />taZ sz <br />Nmin= <br />(d X )z <br />where: <br />I <br />to =one-tailed t-value with (n-1) degrees of freedom, a=0.10 <br />sZ =sample variance <br />d = 0.1 (0.15 for woody plant) (level of precision or desired detectable reduction) <br />x = sample mean <br />Confidence Limits <br />Confidence limits for comparisons to reference areas and technical standards were calculated <br />using a 1-tailed t-value for alpha error probability of 0.10 at (n-1) degrees of freedom multiplied by <br />the standard error of the mean of the sampled area. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.