My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP31877
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP31877
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:08:08 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:03:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/25/1984
Doc Name
REVIEW OF EDNA MINES 1983 HYDROLOGIC MONITORING REPORT AND PREDICTES HYDROLOGIC IMPACT FOR THE MIDTE
From
MLRD
To
GREGG SQUIRE
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-~- <br />Comments/Recommendations <br />TL,... .. -ir ..J •- L. _JJ.____-J L. l..l 11 <br />.J <br />1. Since establishment of baseline monitoring P&M's monitoring program has <br />been decreased to a minimal level. This program does not easily allow for <br />detection of slowly developing trends, however this is not a problem at this <br />time. The water quality in Trout Creek is good, especially during periods of <br />irrigation. The worst water quality occurs in the fall and early spring just <br />prior to runoff and this quality is within acceptable limits. Following are <br />my comments on the current monitoring program. <br />a, According to the present program, P&M should be monitoring all sites <br />for water levels and field parameters every month except December, <br />Januaryary a~Fe~ruary. In addition to the above mentioned months, P&M <br />has not been monitoring in November or March. If sampling is not <br />possible at these times then P8d~i needs to report this in their quarterly <br />monitoring results and/or request a change in their monitoring program. <br />b. As part of their permit application, PBdd committed to water quality <br />monitoring at several additional locations (TR-E, a site to be <br />established in the draw between West Ridge and Center Ridge, and the <br />sediment ponds). The Division has received no information from these <br />sites. This information should be submitted to the Division. <br />c. Surface water site TRC should be reinstated into the monitoring <br />program this year. TRC is located in close proximity to the headgate <br />for the Homestead Ditch and should be a good indicator of the quality of <br />water entering the irrigation ditch. <br />d. The present monitoring program requires a full suite analysis <br />during runoff at the mine site but before runoff begins upstream from <br />the mine (least dilution effects), 2 months later during peak runoff <br />(greatest dilution effects) and in late fall just before winter freeze. <br />The second reading is indicative of the best water quality of Trout <br />Creek and is not a period of concern, I propose a change in monitoring <br />from that time to late August when the waters of Trout Creek will most <br />likely heavily be used for crop irrigation. <br />e. Water levels must be recorded from alluvial wells when field <br />parameters are taken. If this data has been recorded it has been <br />infrequently reported to the Division. If these records are available <br />they must be submitted to the Division. Future quarterly reports must <br />include water levels in alluvial wells. <br />f. All changes in the monitoring program must be submitted to the <br />Division as a technical revision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.