My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP31877
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP31877
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:08:08 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:03:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/25/1984
Doc Name
REVIEW OF EDNA MINES 1983 HYDROLOGIC MONITORING REPORT AND PREDICTES HYDROLOGIC IMPACT FOR THE MIDTE
From
MLRD
To
GREGG SQUIRE
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-g- <br />The purpose of submittal of these reports is to assess the impacts that mining <br />operations have had on the hydrologic balance during that year and <br />implications for future mining operations. This is accomplished by means of <br />comparing ongoing sampling for the year with that collected during baseline <br />and subsequent years. The more complete the documentation, the easier it is <br />for the company to substantiate predictions of hydrologic impact and renew or <br />revise the permit. The Division is not responsible for data reduction and <br />tabulation to substantiate predications made by the company as to the effects <br />of mining, that is the responsibility of the company. Once the initial <br />tabulation is accomplished it is relatively easy to add a years worth of <br />collected data. <br />Information contained in the Annual Hydrology Report should include: <br />a. Results of all hydrologic data collected for that year and any past <br />baseline or ongoing data collected, tabulated such that trends in the data can <br />be readily identified. <br />b. Discussion of any developing trends, anomalies or missing data related <br />to that year's monitoring program. <br />c. Evaluation of impacts of mining and reclamation on the hydrologic <br />balance during that year and predictions of anticipated hydrologic impacts for <br />up-coming years. This evaluation should not be limited to salt loading but <br />should address any chemical parameter which appears to be developing a trend <br />toward increased concentration in the hydrologic system. <br />P&M may want to consider investigating, through the Division's open files, the <br />Annual Hydrologic Reports of other mines in the area of the Edna Mine to gain <br />more information on data tabulation and evaluation. <br />I will be glad to answer any questions that P&M may have. The hydrologic <br />balance of this area will become increasingly important as P8d4 prepares to <br />move into the Moffat Area, an area of previously undisturbed land. <br />Summary <br />Because present mining is in an area of previous disturbance, it does not <br />appear to be having a negative impact on the surface waters of Trout Creek or <br />Oak Creek. <br />Trout Creek carries enough flow to provide dilution of waters from the mine <br />area, both previously disturbed spoils water and water related to present <br />mining activities. There is some degradation in water quality from upstream <br />of the mine to downstream, however the water quality still falls within <br />acceptable limits established for Trout Creek. The parameters periodically <br />showing above the acceptable limits are so at both the upstream and downstream <br />sites. These are not the same parameters that showed increases from upstream <br />to downstream sites. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.