My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP31696
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP31696
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:07:52 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 6:00:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1997 AHR & ARR VEGETATION
Annual Report Year
1997
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• COVER <br />Total vegetation cover on all reclaimed areas sampled in 1997 was significantly lower <br />than in the 1996 sampling (Savage and Savage, 1996). In 1997, total vegetation cover <br />on the Osgood Sand Reference Area exhibited a minor decrease of 0.9 percent from the <br />1996 cover values. In contrast, the 1985 Reclamation Area exhibited a 22.4 percent <br />decrease from 1996, the 1986 Reclamation Area showed a 32.7 percent decrease from <br />the 1996 cover values, and the 1987 Reclamation Area exhibited a 29.0 percent <br />decrease in total cover from that sampled in 1996. <br />The reclaimed area exhibiting the lowest vegetation cover during the 1997 sampling <br />was the 1985 Reclamation Area with 24.20 percent total vegetative cover. The 1987 <br />Reclamation Area exhibited the highest level of total vegetation cover with 26.80 <br />percent. The total percent spread in cover for the three reclamation areas for 1997 was <br />2.60 percent, representing 10 percent of the mean value of the total cover from all <br />reclaimed areas. The total vegetation cover on all reclaimed areas in 1997 was <br />significantly less than that sampled within the Osgood Sand Reference Area in 1997. <br />For this reason the 1985, 1986, and 1987 Reclamation Areas would not meet the final <br />revegetation success criterion for cover if this comparison was based solely on the 1997 <br />cover data. <br />Figure 3 presents a comparison of total herbaceous cover from the Osgood Sand <br />• Reference Area and the 1985, 1986, and 1987 Reclaimed Areas for the years 1994 <br />through 1997. This data is plotted against January-July precipitation amounts. 1t is <br />significant to note that the reclaimed areas always exhibit higher levels of herbaceous <br />cover than the Osgood Sand Reference Area over all precipitation regimes. This <br />indicates that differences in total vegetation cover between the reference area and the <br />reclaimed areas is solely related to cover provided by woody plant species. Since the <br />reclamation was designed to fulfill post-mining land uses which do not depend on <br />woody shrubs, it may be prudent to re-examine the propriety of comparing a woody <br />shrub dominated community with a warm season grassland, when discussing the <br />success of revegetation at the Keenesburg Mine. <br />HERBACEOUS PRODUCTION <br />As with vegetation cover, herbaceous production from all areas during the 1997 <br />growing season was significantly less than encountered in the 1995 sampling <br />(production sampling was not undertaken in 1996, in accordance with sampling <br />requirements for Phase I and II bond release). In 1997, herbaceous production on the <br />Osgood Sand Reference Area was 81.6 percent less than herbaceous production in <br />1995. Similarly, herbaceous production at the 1985 Reclamation Area was 90.0 <br />percent lower than 1995, and the 1986 and 1987 Reclamation Areas exhibited <br />herbaceous production 79.0 percent and 84.0 percent less than their corresponding <br />. areas in 1995. <br />-14- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.