Laserfiche WebLink
RAG. Empire Corporation 2000 AHR <br />SURFACE WATER MONITORING <br />RIVERS <br />There are two rivers in the vicinity of the mine site. The Yampa, flows in a southeasterly <br />direction across the mine site. The Yampa River drains most of the northeast comer of <br />Colorado and part of south-central Wyoming. The second river is the Williams Fork, which is a <br />major tributary of the Yampa River. The Williams Fork River joins the Yampa River on the <br />mine property. Monitoring data is collected for the Williams Fork River. Monitoring data is <br />also collected from one spring, the #] Strip Pit (NPDES site 022). <br />FLOW S <br />The U.S. Geologic Survey at one continuous gaging station and one staff gage collects the <br />Williams Fork River flow data. The Wiliiams Fork River continuous gaging station (w%F-2) is <br />near the confluence with the Yampa River, downstream of the #5 Mine discharge. The staff <br />gage (WF-1) is located upstream of the mine discharge points. The flow data for Station WF-2 <br />for 2000 was provided by the USGS. A plot of daily mean flow versus time for the Williams <br />Fork River for 2000 is presented in Figure 22. For the Williams Fork River at RAG Empire <br />Corporation, flows measured by the USGS during calendar year 1996 showed a maximum <br />mean daily flow of 1230 cfs and a minimum mean daily flow of 15 cfs. Monthly minimum, <br />maximum and mean flows are plotted for each month of record in Figure 23. The flows in the <br />Williams Fork River during 2000 appear to be about average for the period of record. These <br />flows including comparison between up gradient, WF-l, and down gradient, WF-2, measured <br />to date, do not show any stream depletion impacts from mine dewatering. <br />WATER QUALITY <br />Summaries of the water quality data are presented in Tables 27 through 30. A plot of upstream <br />and downstreant dissolved solids measurements for the river is presented in Figure 24. The data <br />indicates that the surface water quality does not show any significant variation from expected <br />values. The comparisons of data from the upstream and downstream station on [he Williams <br />Fork River indicate that there is no detectable effect of mining on river water quality. As <br />expected, dissolved solids decrease with increasing flow rate in the rivers, due to dilution from <br />runoff. <br />SPRINGS <br />FLOW S <br />• One spring on the mine site area is being monitored. The spring is [he #1 Strip Pit Discharge. <br />The #1 Strip Pit Discharge is an NPDES monitoring point (Outfall 022). There are a few other <br />1~\Environmental\EMPIRE\A}1R\2000\Text\Empire2000AHR.doc Page 6 <br />