My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP30695
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP30695
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:01:11 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 5:42:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/7/2002
Doc Name
3rd Quarter 2002 Certification Fill Area # 7 (July 7, 2002)
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAINAGE SYSTEM (UNDERDRAINS) <br />Drain sizes are specified by CDMG regulations for fills which can be classified as Valley Fills. Fill area #7 <br />is not a valley fill. CTL Thompson recommended a minimum 6' x 12' triangular section(area = 64 SF) for <br />this size fill. As constructed drainages generally were more trapezoidal with a top width of 12', bottom <br />width of 8', and average height of 8' (azea = 80 SF). Sandstone recovered fiom durable "channel" <br />sandswne deposits encountered durint; the mining process were used in drain construction. Mirafi 160 <br />fabric was used in lieu of filter material. <br />FILL PLACEMENT <br />CDMG regulations require that spoil be "placed in horizontal lifts in a controlled manner, concurrently <br />compacted as necessary to ensure mass stability". Maximum lift thicknesses are not specified. Lifts were <br />placed in accordance with plans specified by the CTL Thompson report. <br />Spoil material was transported to the fill area using a combination of trucks and dozers. Left thicknesses of <br />upto 50 feet were placed within the area removed Gom the fill face by more than 50 feet. Thinner lifts of 6 <br />to 8 feet with leveling and compactive effort supplied by dozers were utilized as fill placement advanced <br />within the final slope face, followed by grading into final bench configuration. <br />COVER MATERIAL <br />No cover material has been placed on the excess spoil. <br />DOC~UM~E-NTATION ~~~~Q ~f <br />1~/"i0'lG S ~~ ~'V'/c~~j z'"',m'~ ~f~i~~ ~ _ Gr'i~Ct,K- ~iT~ .Cr1--, . <br />CER"I'IFICATION <br />Inspection was conducted by Ronald G. Thompson, a qualified professional and MSHA certified inspector <br />of earth and rockfill embankments and impoundments, under the direction of Mr. Charles McGlothlin. <br />This is to certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that Fill No. 7 construction and placement, as <br />noted since the previous certification and as determined during this inspection and discussions with mine <br />personnel, is in accordance with designs as proposed by CTL Thompson in their report dated April 27 and <br />amended July 27, 2001 and as approved by the Division of Minerals and Geology. <br />,:,n;,,, <br />t ryas. _.'/ea. <br />t,a:; <br />Ronald G. ppp~tto~~y}pp son Charles W. McGlothlin ~~ _•~ - <br />Inspector ~'-7 7C~~ Z Professional Engineer ~ ~~, ; i%'~ <br />i !~ L <br />', i <br />Inspections completed in compliance with Rule 4.09.1(1 1)(b) must be submitted [o the Division within two weeks.,,. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.