My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP30412
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP30412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:00:51 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 5:37:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/31/2003
Doc Name
2002 Annual Hydrology Report
From
Blue Mountain Energy Inc
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2002
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.0 HYDROLOGY AND MINE DEVELOPMENT <br />This monitoring period from October 1, 2001 to September 30, 2002 has provided the <br />hydrologic information necessary to assess the adequacy of monitoring program, the adequacy <br />of the mitigative measures designed to protect the hydrology, and identify and quantify impacts <br />that may have occurred during this period. <br />3.1 Mining Related Hydrologic Impacts <br />The only impacts identified to date include: <br />• Withdrawal of water for the mine from the lagoon adjacent to the White River thus slightly <br />reducing the flow in the White River. BME has legal right to this water. <br />• Discharge of storm water from ponds SS-1, RP2/3 and RP4 into Red Wash and DP-1 into <br />Scullion Gulch, White River tributaries. Discharges contained lower TSS than typical <br />receiving stream flows during storm events. <br />• Decline in piezometric level in wells in close proximity to mine workings. Holes that were <br />mined through typically turned dry. <br />• Subsidence in Red Wash resulting in ponding of surface water. The ponds quickly fill with <br />Gay and silt with Red Wash maintaining its original channel. <br />• Subsidence in Scullion Gulch with no surface hydrologic consequences observed to date. <br />Not enough precipitation has occurred to truly test the system. Runoff was rarely observed <br />in the impacted sections of Scullion Gulch prior to mining. <br />3.2 Comparison of Projected Impacts with Observed Impacts <br />The comparisons of the projected impacts (probable hydrologic consequences) with the <br />observed impacts are discussed in the following. <br />The water withdrawal rate from the lagoon at the White River this reporting year was estimated <br />at 158,503,473 gallons or 486 acre-feet. This compares with an expected withdrawal rate of <br />552 acre-feet per year at full production. <br />The deGine in piezometric levels in bedrock zones "upper sandstone fades", "siltstone/coal <br />fades", and "lower sandstone fades" was anticipated as probable impacts as the result of <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.