Laserfiche WebLink
Mountain Coal Company 1997 Annual Hydrology Report {i'es~ Elk hfine <br />roof inflows were reported to have initial inflows of less than 5 gpm which later diminished to <br />• dry or damp areas. Inflows from the roof and rib of [he ] 0 Northeast headgate at Cross-cut #20 <br />were initially observed at 80 gpm later decreasing to the current inflow rate of approximately 35 <br />gpm. <br />The most significant groundwater inflows occurred on January 20, 1997 when MCC intercepted <br />a southwest to northeast-trending fault in the 14 Southeast Headgate, as discussed previously. <br />By the end of January, this inflow had diminished to approximately 1,750 gpm and to 800 gpm <br />by the first week in February. By the end of WY97 inflows had decreased to approximately 200 <br />gpm. <br />MCC worked diligently to control the inflow for the safety of the miners and to minimize the <br />impact on the North Fork and future mining operations. After four days of round-the-clock <br />pumping and pipe installation, anon-advancing "shoreline" was established within the mine (i.e., <br />on January 24, 1997, the outgoing pumping rate was equal to the inflow rate). Initially, the <br />inflow water was pumped to MCC's sedimentation ponds, MB-1 and MB-2R. Because of the <br />magnitude of the inflow, MCC anticipated having to dischazge some of the mine inflow water <br />either via the sedimentation ponds, potentially without sufficient settling time, or directly to the <br />river (after receiving approval by WQCD). As a result, water sampling from above and below <br />the dischazge points was conducted to establish baseline conditions. A biological assessment <br />conducted by W WE before and after the discharges showed that there was no significant impact <br />to the river. <br />Lab analysis showed the fault water to be moderately alkaline, and to contain sodium <br />• bicarbonate, calcium carbonate, high conductivity (>4,000 µmhos/cm) and high total dissolved <br />solids concentrations (2,950 mg/L). These values are higher than the parameters associated with <br />the fault encountered in the B East Mains and the stable isotopic compositions aze also different, <br />leading to the conclusion that the 14 SE Headgate fault was a different system. <br />The 80°F to 84°F temperature of the groundwater in the fault system indicates that it was in <br />contact with an area having a more exaggerated geothermal gradient that might be found near <br />igneous intrusives such as those associated with Mount Gunnison. The water is apparently <br />contained in fractures in the Rollins Sandstone surrounding each fault system, which are <br />hydrodynamica]ly separate. The waters are thousands of years old and are likely recharged at the <br />cliff face near Minnesota Creek. The waters travel extremely slowly and the ultimate destination <br />is unknown, but is likely downdip along each fault system. <br />NW Panels Sealed Sump <br />As discussed in the 1996 AHR, due to the presence of a suspended colloid in the mine water that <br />was exceedingly difficult to flocculate and settle, MCC began to spray alum on the surface of the <br />sedimentation ponds in order to meet TSS discharge limits. While this solution was recognized <br />as impractical as a long-term solution due to the large volumes of floc produced, it was the most <br />effective chemical of many tried to reduce TSS concentrations enough to allow compliance <br />discharges. <br />• ]n November 1996, however, this method was no longer feasible since the surfaces of the <br />sedimentation ponds were frozen. Therefore, in order not to violate its CDPS discharge permit <br />8 - .9 age rig t ester ngrneers <br />