Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. <br />Southfield Mine <br />SEMI-ANNUAL SUBSIDENCE MONTI'ORING REPORT <br />Period: January 1 -June 30, 2001 <br />Introduction <br />The semi-annual subsidence monitoring report compares field survey monitoring data to permit <br />predictions for inventoried swctures. Summarized survey data aze shown in attached Table 1, <br />Semi-Annual Subsidence Monitoring Data. These data show location and orientation of <br />monuments and swctures for the reporting period. Additionally, the original survey data and <br />current quarterly survey data for all subsidence monitoring locations are shown on attached Table <br />2, Current Report Data. <br />Field surveys aze conducted quarterly on the swcture monuments shown on Table 1. EFCI will <br />survey the South Grid monument network after mining operations have permanently ceased, as <br />approved in the permit. <br />EFCT performed two quarterly subsidence surveys of the swctures shown on Table 1 during the <br />reporting period. The surveys were conducted using differential GPS equipment for both <br />horizontal and vertical control. Discussion of the subsidence data, and any current visual <br />observation information, is shown below. <br />Discussion <br />1. swctures <br />Structures monitored quarterly for subsidence include the Thompson Ranch buildings, the <br />Florence City water line, and the Newlin Creek point. Summarized survey data for these <br />swctures aze shown on accompanying Table 1, Semi-Annual Subsidence Monitoring Data <br />Summary. Location of the structures and monuments with respect to the Mine layout are shown <br />on Map 17 in the permit application. Discussion of survey monitoring data compared to permit <br />predictions for inventoried swctures follows below. <br />1. l Thompson Ranch Structures <br />Survey data for the reporting period indicate vertical changes, compared to original data, ranging <br />from -0.25 to -0.32 feet. These values were obtained during the 2nd quarter survey. During this <br />survey there was a 0.2 to 0.3 foot 'variation' in the elevation data believed to be from GPS <br />survey technique. No subsidence is expected since mining has not occurred below the ranch area <br />that would cause measurable subsidence. In addition, there are no physical indications of <br />subsidence on or near the monitored swctures. <br />