Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1713 Sherman 51.. Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 13031 866 3567 <br />FAX~13031872-8106 <br />DATE: January 31, 1996 <br />TO: Barbara Pavlik // <br />FROM: Dan Mathews L -J/~/~ <br />RE: McClane and Munger 1995 AAR's <br />File No. C-80-004 (McClane), and C-81-020 (Munger) <br />~I~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames 5 cxhhead <br />Ececmive Oirectar <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Dneaor <br />I have conducted a preliminary review of the referenced AHR's <br />(enclosed), and verified that monitoring frequency for the various <br />surface and ground water sites was conducted in compliance with the <br />required schedule, and required parameters were analyzed. I am <br />requesting your review of the report with regard to whether the <br />monitoring indicates that observed effects are in accordance with <br />PHC projections. <br />Note that data for well GW-3 was reported <br />anticipation of submittal of a TR to substitut <br />which would be dropped from the monitoring plan. <br />Well GW-6 was dry all year, as it has been since <br />several years ago. I believe the original intent <br />to document baseline conditions at the proposed <br />site prior to initiation of waste disposal. Is <br />for continued monitoring of this dry well, <br />discontinued until refuse disposal is initiated? <br />Let me know if you have any questions. <br />Thanks. <br />this year, in <br />e GW-3 for GW-4, <br />Also note that <br />it was installed <br />of this well was <br />refuse disposal <br />there any reason <br />or could it be <br />me\95mcmnhr.mem <br />