My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_REPORT - C1981028 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
_REPORT - C1981028 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2020 9:37:47 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 5:27:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
1988 EVALUATION OF ESTABLISHING VEGETATION
Annual Report Year
1988
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br /> Prairie sandreed <br /> There is no question that the most outstanding <br /> species used in reclamation seedings at the Keenesburg Mine <br /> is Prairie sandreed. This is supported by the strong, <br /> co-dominant position it has in the climax vegetation of the <br /> Deep Sand Range site of the Central High Plains . Prarie <br /> sandreed produced 27 . 6 per cent of the cover and 46 per cent <br /> of the biomass in the ' 85 RA and 11 per cent and 8 per cent <br /> in the more recent ' 86 RA. The strong rhizomatous habit with <br /> copious seed production, almost from the outset of its <br /> growth, give this sandy land grass tremendous advantages in <br /> the establishment of vegetative cover. Seed originating <br /> from as near as possible to the site will be even more <br /> favored for planting than the "Goshen" selection. <br /> Sand bluestem <br /> Standing with Prairie sandreed as a co-dominant <br /> in the Deep Sand range site , Sand bluestem should be relied <br /> 1 <br /> on for becoming a major grass of the reclaimed areas at the <br /> mine . Sand bluestem produced 24 . 9 per cent of the cover and 11 <br /> per cent of the biomass on the 1988 Reference Area. The <br /> low rating Sand bluestem had in the ' 85 RA with a three <br /> per cent of the cover and only two percent of the biomass is <br /> difficult to understand unless itcan be blamed on poor seed v <br /> quality , to distant seed origin, or faulty planting technique. <br /> Sand bluestem had still lower grades in the ' 86 RA where <br /> it was no more than 1 . 7 and 1. 0 percent respectively for <br /> cover and biomass . Otherwise there is little reason to question <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.