My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP29652
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP29652
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:00:06 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 5:24:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
11/16/2006
Doc Name
1st Half 2006 Subsidence Report
From
Twentymile Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Subsidence Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Peabody Twentymile Coal Company <br />2005 Fish Creek AVF Riparian Vegetation Monitoring <br />Twelve permanent transects were established at random locations running <br />perpendicular to the stream channel and crossing the entire valley floor in 2003. Six <br />additional permanent transects were established in 2005 at random locations directly <br />northeast of the original transects above mining panels 16 and 17. The 2005 transects <br />also run perpendicular to the stream channel and cross the entire valley floor (Map 1. <br />2005 Additional Monitoring Transects). For all transects, start and endpoints were <br />established on either the Tl banks or terrace several feet above the 100-year floodplain to <br />help ensure the markers are not washed out by seasonal flooding events. Their locations <br />were staked in the field with steel T-posts or fiber-glass posts and GPS surveyed. <br />Due to extensive agricultural use in the study azea and the end goal of establishing <br />the effects of subsidence, factors used to define community types were modified to better <br />suit this study. The Forest Service defined community types outlined in the GTR are <br />based on vegetation communities common in natural ripazian azeas in which vegetation <br />has not been significantly altered by anthropogenic activities (i.e. agriculture). The azea <br />to be surveyed at TMCC has been heavily influenced by agricultural activities and <br />therefore, the native vegetation communities types identified and used by the USFS were <br />not applicable. Furthermore, the Forest Service methodology focuses on ascertaining the <br />effectiveness of management practices in order to draw comparisons with potential <br />natural communities that could exist in an ideal healthy ripazian complex for a given azea. <br />Since monitoring at TMCC focuses on composition and distribution, rather than <br />estimated potentials, the vegetation community descriptions and methodologies have <br />been modified to fit this site's conditions and evaluation objectives. <br />To facilitate implementation and achieve consistent results on an annual basis, <br />vegetation community sub-types were developed in 2003 based on dominant vegetation <br />chazacteristics, while ignoring minor species components. These sub-types were then <br />consolidated into community types based on shazed inherent qualities (Table 1). For <br />example, sparsely vegetated mud flats and eroded stream banks may have Cazex species, <br />Juncus species, or a combination of both. Since both species aze strongly influenced by <br />the effects of seasonal flooding and their proximity to ground water, both were included <br />in the "Riparian" community type. Likewise, smooth brome (Bromus inermis) and <br />Habitat Management, Inc. Page 3 3/14/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.