My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP29511
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP29511
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:59:57 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 5:20:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/2/1993
Doc Name
1992 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT TEXT
Annual Report Year
1992
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• tower then normal snowpacks in the vicinity during the last six years. An exception to <br />this would be the water levels et alluvial wells 6A1 to 6A3 which have shown higher water <br />levels due to recently introduced irrigation in that area. <br />Water Quality. Table 3 (Appendix A), Summery of Ground Water Monitoring Wells, describes <br />the wells that are sampled end et what frequency they are sampled. In 1992, samples were <br />collected from seventeen welts. In addition, four wells from which water samples are <br />required were either dry or had not enough water to sample. <br />Table 4 (Appendix A) shows the ground water parameter list used for all wells. Analyses <br />have been performed by pCZ Laboratory in Steamboat Springs, Colorado since Nay 31, 1983. <br />AC2 Laboratory performs all analyses by EPA or equivalent methods. Samples are delivered <br />the day of collection to the lab in an iced roofer. The following discussion of the <br />analytical data collected during the reporting period is arranged by strata being <br />monitored end coincides with the format (by aquifer type) in which the analytical data are <br />presented in Appendix D. Sampling techniques for each well are given in the remarks page <br />in the same appendix. <br />• Tables 5 to 7 (A <br />endix A) tabulate the <br />ercenta <br />f <br />illi <br />iv <br />l <br />t lit f <br />j <br /> pp <br />p <br />ge o <br />m <br />equ <br />a <br />en <br />s per <br />er o <br />ma <br />or <br /> ions and total dissolved solids (TDS) for each well sampled. All date prior to 1990 has <br />been averaged together to provide the baseline (i.e., premining) conditions that existed. <br />In addition, the range of total dissolved solids (TDS) that existed prior to mining is <br />also given. Since mining began in 1990, data from that point on is listed separately. <br />The following discussion of water quality wilt limit itself to a description of major <br />ions. A separate section, Comparison of Ground Wa[er Quality to Water Use Standards, wilt <br />list those samples that exceed water use standards. <br />Alluvium. Well bA2 displays a CaM gN a-HC03 type water with en average TDS values in 1992 <br />of 732 mg/l. This is higher than the 611 mg/l baseline average, but falls within the <br />baseline range of 454 to 900 mg/l. This well exists in the Hubberson Gulch alluvium <br />upstream of mine discharges. [rri9ation of the pasture surrounding this well began Nay 6, <br />1989. All samples from this well collected after that date have had a higher TDS value <br />than samples collected prior to that date. <br />• Yell 7A2, located in the Hubberson Gulch alluvium downstream of mine discharges, displays <br />a CaNg-HC03 SO4 type water with an average TDS value in 1992 of 1,134 mg/l. This is higher <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.