My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP29191
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP29191
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:59:41 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 5:15:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
11/13/1995
Doc Name
DRAFT REFUSE AREA REVEGETATION STUDY DESERADO MINE C-81-018
From
DMG
To
WESTERN FUELS UTAH
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depan mcnl ul Nawral Resources <br />I i l l Sherman 51 . Room _' 15 <br />Urnvcr. Colorado Hf1'_03 <br />I'hunc:111U1 HGh-}567 <br />November 13, 1995 <br />Mr. Murari P. 8hrestha, P.E. <br />Asaiataat Manager of Engineering <br />Western Fuela - IItah <br />405 Urban Street <br />Suite 305 <br />Lakewood, Colorado 80228 <br />Re: Draft Refuse Area Revegetation Study <br />Deserado Mine (C-81-018) <br />Dear Mr. Shrestha: <br />~a <br />~~~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romcr <br />Governor <br />lames 5. Lochhead <br />Execmive Dueuor <br />Michael B. Long <br />Urvninn Director <br />Enclosed is a copy of a memo from Dan Mathews of the Division <br />regarding his review of the above referenced Refuse Area <br />Revegetation Study. The salient points which need to be addressed <br />or acknowledged in the final report are outlined below and expanded <br />upon in Dan's memo: <br />i) Figure 4 is misleading, because the reference area cover <br />value of 11.9$ excludes shrub cover. Please include <br />shrub cover in the reference area cover value. <br />2) Of the forbs listed in the seed mix, only Utah sweetvetch <br />and globemallow are likely to be successful in <br />revegetating the refuse piles. The Division suggests <br />that WFU consider removing arrow leaf balsamroot from the <br />seed mix and adding other forbs such as small burnet, <br />palmer pentstemon, etc. <br />3) The Division recommends increasing the seeding rate to 40 <br />PLS/sq. ft. <br />4) Please explain why the units of #/600 m2 used for woody <br />plant density when the plots were 900 mz? <br />5) Transect data with woody plant numbers by species should <br />be included in Table 2. <br />6) The woody plant density for the reference area is high <br />and may be difficult to achieve in a reasonable time <br />period. WFU might consider requesting a reduction in the <br />standard. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.