My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP29181
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP29181
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:59:41 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 5:15:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/29/1996
Doc Name
1995 AHR text and data
Annual Report Year
1995
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• the creek between TR-B and TR-D have also become marshes due to numerous <br />beaver dams. <br />Periodically, this general pattern is interrupted, as occurred in 1986, <br />1988, 1991, 1993 and 1995. The "spikes" in TSS levels during these years <br />appear to be related to peak flow conditions along the creek. The 1986 and <br />1988 occurrences are probably residual effects of the initial channel <br />restabilization while the latter years reflect high peak flows. <br />Specific Conductivity <br />Specific conductivity levels (Figure 5) from September 1992 through the <br />end of the report period were similar to values obtained prior to October <br />1990. Data taken between October 1990 and August 1992 are believed to be <br />invalid due to instrument errors. All four sites exhibited a marked increase <br />in specific conductivity for the October 1990 and August-October 1991 <br />readings. TDS values obtained during these same periods do not reflect the <br />increases, therefore it is believed that the data excursions can be attributed <br />to errors with the instrumentation rather than a reflection of actual field <br />• conditions. After the October 1990 reading, the equipment was repaired and <br />used until July 1991, when a mechanical malfunction required switching to <br />alternate instrumentation. It is believed that the alternate equipment was <br />improperly calibrated or defective, resulting in inaccurate readings. New <br />field equipment has been used since September 1992 along with laboratory <br />verification. The values shown in Figure 5 from 1992 through 1999 are the <br />laboratory values. Since the field values and laboratory values have been in <br />close agreement since 1992, values provided beginning in 1995 are field <br />values. <br />Total Dissolved Solids <br />Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) concentrations (Figure 6) in Trout Creek <br />exhibit an expected pattern. As stream flow passes the mine, TDS levels <br />increase while adjacent to the mined areas and then begin to decline <br />downstream due to inflow from undisturbed lands below the active mine. Peak <br />TDS levels in Trout Creek occur in early spring prior to the period of peak <br />flow. This is caused by the uptake of dissolved solids during the spring <br />runoff from the portion of the watershed in which the Edna Mine is located. <br />• Although TDS concentrations in the mine runoff may be quite high when compared <br />to concentrations occurring above the mine, the mine runoff is small relative <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.