My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP28932
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP28932
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:59:28 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 5:11:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981047
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
11/26/1993
Doc Name
1992 AHR comment letter
From
DMG
To
MINREC INC
Annual Report Year
1992
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />OF ~~O <br />Depanmenl o(Nalural Resources tie <br />Ne/ <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 ' <br />•' <br />Phone: (3031 8663567 rats <br />FAX: 1303) 8328106 <br />Roy Romer <br />November 26, 1993 Governor <br /> Michael B. Long <br />Mr. Jim Stover Divfslon otreaor <br />Minrec, Inc. <br />2768 Compass Drive, Suite 101 <br />Grand Junction, Co 81506 <br />RE: Review of 1992 Annual Hydrology Report; Blue Ribbon Mine; <br />File No. C-81-047 <br />Dear Mr. Stover; <br />The Division has reviewed the hydrologic monitoring data collected during 1992 <br />for the Blue Ribbon Mine. The Division has the following comments regarding the <br />report: <br />1. It is good practice to include in the permit, a description of how <br />hydrologic monitoring is completed. For example, is discharge <br />obtained using a flume or other method, and how is quality obtained? <br />What instruments are used and what ie the sampling protocol? This <br />should be addressed in regards to surface water and ground water to <br />be included in the permit. <br />2. The frequency of data collection is in compliance with the approved <br />monitoring plan, which ie on page 124 and 124a of the permit. <br />3. Why is no flow recorded for Lower Hubbard Creek? <br />4. Units should be included for conductivity on Upper and Lower Hubbard <br />Creek. This should be provided in the 1993 Annual Hydrologic <br />Report. <br />5. Quality results in Hubbard Creek and bench underdrains appear to be <br />acceptable. <br />6. The water level in the piezometers does not show any anomalies. <br />Thank you for your continued compliance with the terms of your permit. Responses <br />to the above questions should be provided on or before December 31, 1993. <br />Please call if you have any questions. <br />S' rely, <br />Christine E. John on <br />Environmental Pro ect on Specialist <br />CEJ/047.92HR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.