Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />combination of these two soils was noted. Standard Proctor tests <br />the two soil samples. The bulk of the embankment is the sandy-si: <br />which has an optimum moisture content of 7.SX and a maximum dry d~ <br />133.5 pounds per cubic foot. The fine soil, which was quite limi <br />extent, had an optimum moisture content of 19.4X and a maximum dr; <br />109.5 pounds per cubic foot. It is not anticipated that signific, <br />of this clayey soil trill be Found on the project site. The SW-SN <br />more representative of what is found on site, although a higher c: <br />is typically found and reflected in the sample that was tested. <br />In-place testing of the compacted embankment material has reveale <br />125 to 135 pounds per cubic foot and about 6X •oisture content. <br />to 100X of the standard Proctor density, which is in accordance w <br />geotechnical construction. Although the embankment nay utilize s <br />of the historic berm as a foundation, the density found in the hi <br />was also in the vicinity of 135 pounds per cubic foot. This indi <br />resulting compacted embankment can be considered a well construct <br />structure. the embankment can be generally classified as a homog <br />embankment rather than a zoned dam. For this classification it i <br />for some seepage to appear in the downstream face of the dam duri <br />state high water level conditions. As long as no piping (washing <br />out of the dam) occurs, such seepage is a common, expected situat <br />not endanger the structure. <br />• Embankment Slope Design <br />were run on <br />ty material, <br />nsity of <br />ed in <br />density of <br />nt amounts <br />soil is much <br />ay content <br />values of <br />is is 95X <br />h good <br />ie portions <br />oric berm <br />tea the <br />. reliable <br />customary <br />steady- <br />f material <br />n that does <br />As shown on Plate No. lA, the revised embankment is called for to ave a 3:1 <br />slope upstream and downstream, a 15 foot wide crest, and a maximum height of <br />approximately 20 feet above the downstream toe of the embankment. The <br />structural height of the dam will be significantly less since natu al ground <br />rises significantly and probably is on the order of 10 to 14 feet t the <br />center line of the embankment. The embankments were laid out acco ding to the <br />standardized slopes presented in the Bureau of Reclamation's Des of Sma 1 <br />ams, a standard reference text for small earth embankments. Thre -to-one <br />slopes may actually be conservative, since 2.5 or 2:1 slopes would be wit6ln <br />those accepted guidelines. However, it was decided that conservat sm was <br />preferred. Since standard, commonly accepted embankment slopes ar being used <br />in accordance with the onsite materials found at the Alma Placer p oject, e <br />stability analysis has not been performed. A stability analysis t ically is <br />only performed when an attempt is made to optimize the embankment nd utilize <br />steeper slopes than those recommended by the guidelines noted abov . <br />• Pond Capacity <br />It is anticipated that the bottom of the ponds will De enlarged so ewhat <br />upslope of the embankments. At this time, we estimate that the ma imu^ depth <br />of storage water will be on the order of 8 feet, and the maximum s rface area <br />will encompass an area 800 Eeet long by 200 feet wide. <br />2 <br />