Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />flydrningr .traruurriny Anrvities <br />times per year. <br />Monitored parameters included water level, pH. <br />conductivity, temperature, total dissoved solids. <br />total suspended solids, total iron, and «xal manga- <br />nese. Results of the sampling efforts are summa- <br />rized in AppendLx H. Hydrographs depicting water <br />levels from 1973 to the present have been included <br />as Appendix I. Minimum and maximum c~mpari- <br />sons are presented in Appendix E. <br />Water level and sampling records for water tear <br />1992 were complete (or ten wells. Water in 11 <br />wells was either nonexistent or insufficient fur <br />sampling. Neither water level or quality samples <br />were acquired from the lost wells SOM-~8-H2 and <br />SOM-38-H3. ~ON,~ ~ct~ ~Jx <br />Mine Water Monitoring (J\ <br />Mine water inflows in areas beinC actively mined <br />were mapped during water year 1992. Areas of <br />previous mine inflows were monitored by occasion- <br />al visits. Exhibit 3 shows locations of inflow-s and <br />estimated amounts of mine inflows in the "B" <br />seam. Areas of standing water are also shown. <br />During 1992, samples of mine discharges were <br />taken from the MB-1, MB-2, and MB-6 sediment <br />ponds. They were tested for pH, electrical cunduc- <br />tivity, total suspended solids, total dissolved solids, <br />and total iron. Results of the analyses are shown <br />on Table 5. The higher levels of conductivity, TDS, <br />and iron are probably due to discharges of the <br />more mineralized water and refuse associated with <br />the B seam. However, the overall quality o(water <br />sampled was good and posed no problem for direct <br />discharge to a stream or other surface feature. <br />"F" Seam <br />No new minine occurred in the F scam and no <br />new inflows were observed. The I West, 1 East, <br />and 1 Northwest Submains were sealed off at the <br />Southwest and South Main Intakes and nu further <br />monitoring of these areas can be conducted. <br />Existing inflows in the Main Intakes were similar <br />ro those shown last year. Refer to the map <br />entitled "F Scam Mine Map -Hydrologic C~ndi- <br />tions - Water Ycar 1991" in the 1991 Annual <br />Hydrolofry Report. <br />"B" Seam <br />~~M1 L <br />Small quantitites of water (<1 GPM) were <br />encountered during development mining in 1991. <br />Because dripping and water inFluw gencralh <br />subsided within ''-d hours, the water appears to be <br />contained within Fractures and found in association <br />with roof joints, minor fauhs, or rock spars. Areas <br />of damp top persisted lucall_v along the more <br />pronounced fracture trends. <br />Water inflows were greatest along the more highly <br />fractured zones. Initial water inllotvs were estimat- <br />ed as hi:h as 20 gpm. After fractures were de- <br />watered, inflows dropped substantially. No loca- <br />tions produced sustained Oows ul water (Exhibit <br />±). No seasonal variation in flows was observed. <br />The mine water balance, based on actual and <br />estimated flows, is shown in Table 6. The quantity <br />of water discharged or pumped from the mine was <br />approximately 37 acre feet. Water unaccounted for <br />is lost through seepage and evaporation into the <br />ventilating air. Both of these losses can be large, <br />depending on conditions. <br />• <br />