Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />I <br />Hydologic Monitoring Ac~ivitics <br />ary, but it was mid-April before all stilling wells <br />had thawed. Debris buildup in the flumes was <br />minimal during 1992 and no data were lost due to <br />debris. <br />[n addition to the five MCC monitoring locations, <br />flow data are available from two USGS monitoring <br />stations. These stations are Minnesota Creek <br />downstream of Dry Creek and the North Fork of <br />the Gunnison River near Somerset, Colorado. The <br />North Fork sta[ion is loca[ed approximately ~/.- <br />mile upstream of the mine site. Because the <br />USGS gauging stations are heated, they were <br />unaffected by freezing temperatures. Data for the <br />1992 water year for these sites are presented in <br />Appendix B and Appendix C, respec[ively. <br />Seasonal (three times per year) water samples were <br />taken at all surface water monitoring stations <br />except the USGS North Fork station which is a <br />^ow data point only. Measured parameters includ- <br />ed pH, conductivity, temperature, total dissolved <br />solids, total suspended solids, total iron, and total <br />manganese. Sampling results are summarized in <br />Appendix D. Minimum and maximum information <br />for the baseline monitoring period is compared <br />with water year 1992 data for [he Sylvester Gulch <br />and North Fork Upper stations in Appendix E. <br />Spring Water Monitoring <br />Seven springs were monitored during the 1992 S3 <br />water year (Table 2). Their locations are shown on - <br />Exhibit 1. All known springs in the lease area are <br />shown on Map 34 in Volume 5 of the M and R <br />Plan. <br />In accordance with U.S. Forest Service (USES) <br />stipulations, a map of USES water resources has <br />been included as Exhibi[ 2. Table 3 summarizes the <br />resources. Some of [he USES water resources are <br />springs. No changes in the USES Water Resources <br />Map are necessary for 1992 because no new rights <br />were filed for or new uses made in 1992 in the <br />lease area. <br />Two USES water resources (13l and 139) overlie <br />the current permit area, but are not in areas <br />planned to be mined. Also, the overburden is in <br />excess of 300 feet under these resources and no <br />mining related impacts are anticipated. <br />Seasonal measurements (three times per year) of <br />pH, conductivity, temperature, total dissolved <br />solids, [o[al suspended solids, total iron, and [otal <br />manganese were taken at each of the seven springs. <br />Measured flows, field parameters, and the results <br />of laboratory analyses are presented in Appen- <br />dix F. Maximum and minimum comparisons are <br />Table 2 Summary of the Spring Monitoring Program at the West Elk Mine <br /> <br />Location Frequenry of Discharge <br />Measurement Frequenry of Water Quality <br />Measurement <br />Springs Above the "F' Seam in the North Fork Drainage Basin <br />G-12 3 limes per year 3 times per year <br />G-14 3 times per year 3 times per year <br />G-16 3 times per year 3 times per year <br />G-22 3 times per year 3 times per year <br />G-24 3 times per year 3 times per year <br />Springs in or Below the " F' Seam in [he North Fork Drainage Basin <br />G-la 3 times per year 3 times per year <br />G-20 3 times per year 3 times per year <br />• <br />