Laserfiche WebLink
Chromium <.01 .53 <br />Copper <.01 .35 <br />Lead <.02 .31 <br />Iiercury <.0002 .0014 <br />Molybdenum <.01 ---- <br />Nickel <.02 .OS <br />Phosphorus (ortho) .05 2.79 <br />Vanadium .0.2 .003 <br />SAR (only if sample <br />type is G-SAR) 3.58 9.26 <br />~- <br />H. LAL Well Stations: ~Qa s~~ ,f k`~~ <br />1. Well Station AP-3 ~5 x,,.1 °~ <br />Depth to water at station AP-3 ranged from .3 - 2.9 ft. <br />and had an average of 1.92 ft. This station has no <br />baseline water depth data. <br />Cu ~LI Lt,~yi~ <br />2. Well Station AP-4 s~e4 ~~i ~ <br />Depth to water at station AP-4 ranged from 4.2 - 6.9 ft. <br />and had an average of 5.52 ft. This station has no <br />baseline water depth data. <br />III. Compliance and Water Quality <br />A. All water monitoring requirements were met. <br />B. Baseline TSS values and 1995 values seem to differ a lot, <br />from 44 mq/L currently to a range of 3830 - 4320 mg/L in the <br />baseline data at station 302. <br />C. pH at station 320 seems to have risen a bit, from a <br />baseline range of 6.7 - 6.8 to a range of 7.8 - 8.2 in 1995. <br />D. Electrical conductivity seems to have risen at station <br />300, from a baseline range of 131 - 510 umho/cm to a 1995 <br />range of 400 - 700 umho/cm. <br />E. Electrical conductivity at station 306 rose from a <br />baseline of 35 umho/cm to a range of 400 - 3400 in 1995. TDS <br />at station 306 rose from a baseline value of 68 mg/L to a <br />range of 350 - 3190 mg/L in 1995. A possible explanation for <br />