My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP28218
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP28218
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:58:56 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:59:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/1/1996
Doc Name
REFUSE AREA REVEGETATION STUDY - FINAL REPORT
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Posr-rrrlamarion /nresnyarion <br />' Despite the rebound in percent composition of annuals, 4 of the 8 test plots steadily increased in <br />perennial composition from 1993 through 1995. with the other 4 still well above the 1993 <br />' abundances (Figure a). This appazent trend to~vazd an increase in perennials is encouraeing and <br />indicates that the vegetation is progressing toward aself-sustaining permanent stand. Additionally, <br />' diversity has increased and baze ground has decreased over the 4-year period (Appeudix B). <br />During the 1995 data collection. the reference plot was also sampled. All eight test plots had <br />' much higher total vegetative cover than the reference plot (Figure 2 and Appeudix B-3). <br />However. all test plots had a lower percent perennial cover than the reference plot (Figure 4). <br />Analysis of species composition reveals the almost complete absence of annuals (particularly <br />' cheatgrass and tumble mustard) from the undisturbed reference plot (Table 2). Also. the reference <br />plot had a relatively high amount of shrub cover compared to the test plots. These results suggest <br />that [he test plot vegetation community has not yet fully matured. <br />' The data indicate that soil cover depth does influence vegetative cover. Generally. for all three <br />years of sampling of total vegetative cover, annual species cover, and perennial species cover <br />' (Figures 2, 3, and 4, respectively), the trends indicate that cover was highest on the 36-inch or <br />48-inch cover plots. Cover was also slightly higher on the north facing plots over the south <br />facing plots. It is also reasonable to conclude that other factors such as aspect and moisture are <br />' controlling the abundance and distribution of vegetative cover. <br />For the three years of cover sampling, sample adequacy was reached on all test plots within 10 <br />' or less transects. However, the reference plot was more variable, requiring 19 transects to reach <br />adequacy (Appendix B-1). <br />' Herbaceous Production <br />' The two years of production data presented in Table 3 and Figures 5 through 7 illustrates the <br />overall increase in production found in 1995. Productivity was extremely variable during both <br />years of sampling. Sample adequacy was achieved only once on test plot SI in 1993 (Table 3). <br />' The number of quadrats needed to achieve adequacy was much higher than the l0 per plot <br />sampled (Appendices C-1, C-2, C-3). <br />' Herbaceous production doubled from 1993 to 1995 except for test plots S2 and S3 (Figure 5 and <br />Table 3). Production by annuals was also higher in 1995 than 1993 in all test plots (Figure 6). <br />Field obsen~ations found that, as with vegetative cover. the annual cheatgrass and tumble mustard <br />' were the major contributing species in the increase. Above average spring and early summer <br />precipitation in 1995 probably contributed to the increased production and may have even been <br />the primary factor for the annuals' invasion. <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />' _'J6-OTIWrg-rpi3 1a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.