My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP27953
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP27953
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:58:44 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:55:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/29/2000
Doc Name
1999 REVEGETATION MONITORING REPORTS
From
DMG
To
SENECA COAL CO
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r " ~.•Pt it <br />I~~ I~~I~~I~~'lll'~~ <br />STATE OF COLOIZ~DO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />DeUartment o(Nalural Resources <br />I ll l Sherman 5t., Room 215 <br />DIVISION O F <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone ao31 ebb-3sb~ MINERAL 5 <br />FAX: 130 31 8 3 2-91 05 ~ & <br />GEOLOGY <br />March 29,2000 RECLAMATION <br />MI NING•SAFEiY <br />Mr. Mike Altavilla BillOwens <br />Seneca Coal Company cOVer"°r <br />BOX 670 Greg E. Walther <br />Executive Director <br />Hayden, CO 81639 ,ti,eh,el e. gong <br />Diviiion Director <br />RE: 1999 Revegetation Monitoring Reports <br />Deaz Mr. Altavilla: <br />I have reviewed the Seneca Coal Company (SCC) Annual Revegetation Monitoring <br />Reports for the Seneca Il Mine, Seneca II-W Mine and the Yoast Mine. These reports <br />were prepared by SCC and ESCO Associates, Inc. I also looked at the Results of Annual <br />Shrub Monitoring prepared by Bitterroot Restoration Incorporated. SCC continues to <br />provide comprehensive, well documented data in their revegetation monitoring reports. <br />The data is helpful and provides DMG with valuable information regazding the status of <br />the reclamation and the various techniques that have been undertaken at the SCC mine <br />sites. After looking at the reports, I have the following comments. <br />Seneca No. II <br />The report says that the reclamation sampling units were the 1992 and 1997 <br />reclamation areas shown on Map 1. Map 1 labels the reclamation units as 1995 <br />and 1997. Please clarify what areas were sampled. <br />2. Map 2 was not included. It is referenced under the two stage sampling for the <br />Wadge Pasture. <br />Using Map 1 alone it is difficult to tell where the samples area are. It would be <br />helpful if topographic lines and additional features, such as roads, ponds, and <br />facilities, were included on the Map. <br />4. I overlaid Map l on Exhibit 13-1 of the permit. Exhibit l3-l shows that trees and <br />shrubs would be planted in the 1997 reclaimed area shown on Map 1. I checked <br />the 1997 Annua] Reclamation Report and did not see that they were planted in <br />that area. Were trees and shrubs planted in that unit? <br />5. In the discussion of woody plant density it is stated that [he woody plant density <br />standard is 2,000 stems/acre. This is incorrect. The woody plant density standard <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.