My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP26709
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP26709
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:57:50 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:33:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/19/1995
Doc Name
1ST QUARTER POND AND REFUSE PILE INSPECTION REPORTS SOUTHFIELD MINE PN C-81-014
From
DMG
To
ENERGY FUELS COAL INC
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Review of Refuse Pile & Pond Reports <br />July 19, 1995 <br />Page 4 <br />level of sediment in the pond. <br />Compliance and Adequacy Questions <br />1. The pond inspection reports are done on a quarterly basis as <br />required and general information about the pond is provided as <br />required. However, a specific level of sediment is not <br />included in the report; only general information regarding <br />where sediment has accumulated and a recommendation to clean <br />the pond is included. I assume that the pond designs specify <br />a maximum sediment elevation. While the general information <br />provided in the report regarding sediment in the pond is <br />useful, the inspection report should reference the maximum <br />elevation identified in the pond design. In future pond <br />inspection reports, EFCI should identify the amount of <br />sediment in the pond compared to the maximum sediment <br />elevation specified in the pond design. <br />2. it appears that a majority of the time, the engineer's <br />recommendations regarding pond maintenance is disregarded <br />because the same recommendation appears in subsequent reports. <br />EFCI should comment. <br />EFCI should provide responses to the above questions by August 31, <br />1995. Please call if you have questions. <br />S <br />Christine E. J~n~ton <br />Environmental ro ection Specialist <br />CEJ/014REP01.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.