My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP26199
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP26199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:57:30 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:26:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/6/1995
Doc Name
EDNA MINE CLOSURE MOFFAT AREA STABILITY PN C-80-001
From
DMG
To
SUSAN BURGMAIER
Permit Index Doc Type
STABILITY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Nalu rat Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Ruom 27 5 <br />Denver, Colurado 80203 <br />Phone: (3031 R6(> 3567 <br />FA%:13031832-A106 <br />DATE: September 6, 1995 <br />TO: Susan Burgmaier <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton <br />RE: Edna Mine~Clos3lre~- Moffat Area Stability <br />t No: C-80-001) <br />~~~~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />lames 5. Luchhead <br />Executive Dueclor <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />Muhael 8. Long <br />Division Director <br />In August, before lead on the Edna permit transferred to you, Kent <br />Gorham forwarded a memo regarding the potential stability of the <br />Moffat Area to my attention. The plan will be terminated <br />prematurely, resulting in a configuration different from that <br />originally approved. I have completed a review of the issue. In <br />1990, as a portion of the Moffat Area permit revision adequacy <br />response, we required Edna to analyze the stability of the proposed <br />outside the box cut spoil pile adjoining the Moffat Area. I was <br />concerned because of the history of reclaimed (Center Ridge) and <br />unmined (West Ridge) slope failures at the Edna Mine. Edna <br />completed a stability analysis (Section 3.4 of Permit Revision <br />application), which we subsequently reviewed and accepted. I have <br />revisited the stability analyses, examined the air photos and <br />monitoring well records forwarded by Kent, and revisited my earlier <br />adequacy memos regarding this concern. <br />Earlier stability analyses completed on the Center Ridge reclaimed <br />area landslide, and the Moffat Area both indicate that if an <br />artesian head does not develop beneath the parting separating the <br />Lower Wadge and the Wadge seams, the backfilled spoil slope should <br />be stable. In order to verify that the permit projections <br />regarding phreatic surface within the bedrock and the spoil were <br />accurate, the Division required the installation of several <br />additional monitoring wells. Prior to the cessation of mining in <br />late 1994 the Wadge well appears to show no effect from the <br />approach of the advancing pit. The Lower Wadge well showed more <br />variation, with a general decline and stabilization since 1990 at <br />an elevation approximately 10 feet below its original equilibrium <br />elevation. Since cessation both wells have rebounded, the Wadge <br />well approximately 5 feet and the Lower Wadge well approximately <br />14 feet. However, this spring and summer were unusually wet in <br />Northwest Colorado. A spoil spring has developed and continuously <br />flowed at the low point in the low wall of the Moffat area pit, to <br />the south of the current pit location. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.