My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP25820
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP25820
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:57:16 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:20:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/25/1991
Doc Name
1991 AHR - text & App. A - G
Annual Report Year
1991
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />• <br />• <br />Hydrologic Monitoring Activities <br />The hydrologic monitoring program for the Mt. <br />Gunnison No. 1 Mine began in 1974 with the <br />completion of several groundwater observation <br />wells. This preliminary monitoring network was <br />expanded considerably and in 1981, with the <br />approval of the Mt. Gunnison No. i Mine Mining <br />and Reclamation plan (M and R Plan), became the <br />"approved" hydrology monitoring program. <br />In 1984, 1937, and 1989 the program was revised. <br />The 1984 and 1987 revisions were made to more <br />efficiently monitor possible effects from mining <br />and provide data for future permitting. The 1989 <br />revision incorporated provisions for collecting "B" <br />scam baseline data and monitoring for potential <br />mining impacts in anticipation of the 199(1 opening <br />of the "B" Seam. All revisions wcrc approved by <br />the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />(CMLRD). <br />The 1990 Annual Hydrology Report contains the <br />Collowing: <br />• Data from five continuous flow monitoring <br />stations; <br />• Data from two U. S. Geological Survey <br />(USGS) continuous flow monitoring stations; <br />• Data from seasonal water quality sampling at <br />Iwo surface water quality monitoring stations; <br />Surface Water Monitoring <br />West Elk Coal Company's (WECC) surface water <br />monitoring program includes nine monitoring <br />locations (Table 1). The locations of these moni- <br />toring stations are shown on Exhibit i. Daily flow <br />estimates (including mean, maximum, and mini- <br />mum flows) for the five WECC gauges are summa- <br />rized in Appendix A. Except for two stations with <br />a Cew mechanical problems, the records are <br />complete. <br />'fable 1 Summary of Surtace Wuter Moni- <br />turing Prngrum at the ML Cun- <br />nison No. l Mine <br />SlnUon 6lowAOa xily Walcr Quality <br />Afh:~dor <br />wE<C Sylvester Gulch Continuous A 3 lima per year D <br />USGS/WECC <br />Gaging Station Coninuous Q 3 time per year D <br />East Fork Minnesota <br />wr« Creek Flume Continuous A 3 lima per year D <br />Wece Lower Dry Fork Flume Continuous A 3 lima per year G <br />WtU Upper Dry Fork Flume Continuous A 3 time per year b <br />Wc.ec Lick Creek Flume Continuous /1 3 lima per year D <br />North Fork Upper -- 3 time per year A <br />North Fork Lower -- 31ima per year D <br />USGS North Fork <br />gaging station <br />near Somerset Continuous ~ -- <br />• Data from seasonal measurements of pH, <br />temperature, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and <br />conductivity at the six stream gauging stations <br />in the Minnesota Creek Basin and Sylvester <br />Gulch; <br />• Data from seasonal measurements of dis- <br />charge and water quality sampling at seven <br />springs issuing from or below the "F' scam <br />coal; <br />• Data from seasonal water level and water <br />quality measurements at 23 wells; and <br />• Data from measuremenu of mine water <br />discharges and mapping oC inflow locations. <br />Stilling wells at the five WECC gauges began <br />freezing in October. By the middle of the Decem- <br />ber, all were frozen. Thawing began in February, <br />but it was early April before all stilling wells had <br />(hawed. Debris buildup in the flumes was minimal <br />during 1990 and no data wcrc lost due to debris. <br />In addition to the five WECC monitoring loca- <br />tions, (low data arc available from two USGS <br />monitoring stations. These stations are Minnesota <br />Creek downstream of Dry Creek and the North <br />Fork of the Gunnison River near Somerset, Colo- <br />rado. The North Fork station is located approxi- <br />mately'/a-mile upstream of the mine site. Because <br />the USGS gauging stations arc heated, they were <br />unaffected by freezing temperatures. Data for the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.