Laserfiche WebLink
~ III IIIIIIIIIIIII III ~, <br />1A1~E OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl of Natural Resources ~I~~ <br />I S I S Sherman 51., Runm '_ I i <br />Denver, Colorado A11207 <br />Phnnc' IJOJI AbhJ 567 <br />FAX: 11(171 AJ2~AIIlIi <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />September 16, ]997 c;venorr <br /> dames 5. Luchhrarl <br />Mr. Alan D. Cox Evecmrve D~redor <br /> <br />Homestake Mining Company Michael A. Lunp <br />Division Director <br />650 California Street <br />San Francisco, CA 94108 <br />RE: Evaluation of the Upper and Lower Tailings Ponds, <br />Bulldog Mine, Permit No. M-77-215 <br />Deaz Mr. Cox: <br />The Division has completed its evaluation of the above captioned report prepazed for Homestake <br />Mining Company by Shepherd Miller, Inc. Please find enclosed an evaluation of the <br />geochemical aspects of the Shepard Miller report prepazed by the Division's staff geochemist, <br />Dr. Harry Posey. In his evaluation, Dr. Posey expresses certain reservations about some of the <br />conclusions reached in the Shepard Miller report, but concurs with the overall conclusion that <br />seepage from the Bulldog Mine tailings impoundments is unlikely to cause an unacceptable <br />adverse impact on ground water quality. Please address the two questions raised in Dr. Posey's <br />evaluation memorandum, i.e., how was the water: rock ratio measured for the attenuation tests <br />measured? And, were samples rinsed prior to paste pH analysis? <br />The Division's review of the geotechnical aspects of the Shepazd Miller report fell to me, and my <br />evaluation is provided here. The basic conclusions found in the Shepazd Miller report aze that <br />the tailings in both impoundments will remain saturated, and.that the rate of seepage from the <br />impoundments is such that a minimum dilution rate of three parts unaffected ground water with <br />one part seepage will occur immediately below each impoundment. The Division concurs with <br />the derivation of the minimum dilution rate, and with the position stated in the Shepazd Miller <br />report that this dilution rate is based on conservative assumptions making it likely that seepage <br />will be diluted by more than the 3:1 working estimate. The Division further agrees that the <br />tailings are likely to remain saturated or nearly saturated over the long term. However, it is the <br />Division's position that the potential for the tailings to drain to field capacity does exist. The <br />potential for the tailings to drain would be increased as additional vegetation establishes in the <br />impoundment, if the area is subjected to a prolonged drought, or if the tailings surface were to <br />crust over thus reducing infiltration. <br />