My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP25486
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP25486
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:57:03 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:14:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/25/2005
Doc Name
2004 Annual Hydrology Report Letter & Introduction
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2004
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. is most likely incorrect since adjacent Wells 23 and 24 are normally <br /> dry. The suspect water levels in Well 22 may be a result of water <br /> trapped in the borehole (perhaps by a boulder in the spoils that the <br /> borehole does not ~=ompletely penetrate). Howev er, this well became dry <br /> in August 1998, and continues to be so. Well 23 sometimes shows water <br /> in late February, March, and April as snow melts quickly off this <br /> westerly-facing slope, although it has been dry since 1985. Well 24 has <br /> been dry for the entire period of record. <br />-1 <br />~J <br />I <br />Three wells; 25, 2fi, and 27; are situated in the lower region of spoils <br />above the Wadge Impoundment. All three of these wells were outfitted <br />with continuous rec:orders operated by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) <br />until the end of 1983. Well 25, the highest upgradient of these three <br />wells on the spoils slope, has indicated an absence of recharge since <br />1997. Well 27, lowest of the three, shows that its water levels are <br />most likely dependent upon the water level in the Wadge Impoundment <br />located 50 feet away. Well 26, located between Wells 25 and 27, <br />normally exhibits water levels higher than either 25 or 27. This is not <br />a normal ground water level gradient; therefore, its water levels should <br />be reviewed with caution. Perhaps, as with Well 22, water is being <br />trapped in the borehole. <br />Seven spoil wells crere completed in the fall of 1987. Three (Well 59, <br />60, and 61) were completed upgradient of the Spoils Spring 3 area, while <br />four (Wells 62 to E.5) were completed in the Spoils Spring 1 area. The <br />purpose of placing several wells at each site was to accurately define <br />the potentiometric surface of the spoils aquifer at each location. <br />Water levels at all of these spoil wells exhibit normal seasonal <br />variations. Well 65 has been dry for the entire period of record <br />(except for October 2000, which occurred after a 1.94 inch rainfall in <br />late September). It is located in an area where the spoils are normally <br />unsaturated. This year, all seven wells exhibited water levels within <br />their historic ranges. <br />Ground Water Level Summary. All alluvial wells are showing distinct <br />seasonal water l~=_vel fluctuations in response to periods of <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.