My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP25410
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP25410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:57:00 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:12:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/13/1990
Doc Name
VEGETATION STUDY RESULTS RECEIVED OCT 10 1990
From
MLRD
To
RED CANYON MINE FILE MINREC INC PERMIT C-81-034
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />999 _ <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />FA x'303 832-8106 <br />DATE: December 13, 1990 <br />T0: Red Canyon Mine File; 1dINREC, Inc.; Permit C-81-034 <br />FROM: Carl Mount ~~ <br />RE: Vegetation Study Results received October 10, 1990 <br />pF CprO <br />~4'~` Rr <br />„~,°'>~8 <br />~.~`(7. <br />~ ra'!6 ~ <br />Roy Romer, <br />Governor <br />Fred R. Banta. <br />Division Director <br />I have reviewed the submittal referenced above which outlines the latest <br />vegetation sampling program results from the reclaimed Red Canyon Mine. The <br />submittal also requests permission to remove the sediment pond. <br />The findings document for the permit renewal dated July 29, 1988 states on <br />page 20: <br />"The area of surface disturbance at Red Canyon was previously mined land, <br />and as such, the revegetation success criteria of Rule 4.15.10 applies. <br />Vegetative ground cover is the only success criteria which can be applied <br />on previously mined lands. In general, the Division has assumed that the <br />vegetative cover on pre-disturbance native rangeland is "adequate to <br />control erosion" if signs of excessive erosion are not present. In this <br />instance the vegetation success standard is based on total vegetative <br />cove r. in the sagebrush community adjacent to the affected areas at <br />Red Canyon." <br />This document goes on to state: <br />Based on data collected in the summer of 1983, a vegetative success <br />standard of 26% has been established." <br />The submittal received on October 10, 1990 gives a summary of vegetation <br />sampling results. I have checked the calculations for minimum number of <br />samples and agree with the methods and results with one exception. The sample <br />variance should be 50.24, not the 0.005383 that is stated in the submittal. <br />However, this typographical error had no effect on the final results. The <br />average vegetative cover was found to be 52.4 percent; this was fqr above the <br />approved standard of 26 percent. <br />From these vegetation results, and from recent inspections of the mine site, I <br />recommend that we accept the vegetation study results. Further, I believe <br />that a surface water hydrologist should review the submittal to see if it <br />meets all the requirements of Rule 4.05.2(21 governing sediment pond removal. <br />I believe that it does and would recommend removal following spring runoff ang <br />a close check of the site to see that it does not show "... signs of excessive <br />erosion ...". <br />/e rn <br />2166E <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.