Laserfiche WebLink
HYDROLOGIC MONITORING ACTIVITIES <br /> R:..d'u:�:F:�m:�.^.:i.':f:,n,':.:::n'.':::;:::.xF:SF.:R`:2`.:'nw::S':::3)is9f.'Ati2•.'Ah':C.^..':.n.3n.;q.:;C:..r..::FF.:.T.:MF::.:6.:3.':(S.':6"io.X':i9.:'F:;F:<F:'XC�'S.'."L:il':9:�'.':m:.^.•:£':RSF.`At:�.^gin:::i::C::Cf.'a".'ff:.� <br /> The hydrologic monitoring program at the Mt. • Data from monthly water level and water <br /> Gunnison No. 1 Mine began in 1974 with the quality measurements at two wells com- <br /> completion of several groundwater observation pleted in the "B" seam coal. <br /> wells. This preliminary monitoring network was <br /> expanded considerably and in 1981, with the • Data from measurements of mine water <br /> approval of the Mt. Gunnison No. 1 Mine, Mining discharges, and mapping of inflow loca- <br /> and Reclamation plan(M and R Plan),became the tions. <br /> "approved" hydrology monitoring program. <br /> In 1984, 1987, and 1989 the program was revised. SURFACE WATER <br /> The 1984 and 1987 revisions were made to more MONITORING <br /> efficiently monitor possible effects from mining <br /> and provide data for future permitting. The 1989 West Elk Coal Company's (WECC) surface water <br /> revision incorporated provisions for the collection monitoring program includes nine monitoring <br /> of "B" seam baseline data and monitoring for locations (Table 1). The locations of these moni- <br /> potential mining impacts in anticipation of the toring stations are shown on Exhibit 1. Daily flow <br /> 1990 opening of the "B" Seam. All revisions were estimates (including mean, maximum, and mini- <br /> approved by the Colorado Mined Land Reclama- mum flows) for the five WECC gauges are summa- <br /> tion Division (CMLRD). rized in Appendix A.Except for stations with a few <br /> mechanical problems, the records are complete. <br /> The 1989 Annual Hydrology Report contains the <br /> following: TABLE 1 Summary or Surface Water Moni- <br /> toring Program at the Mt. Gun. <br /> • • Data from five continuous flow monitor- nison No. 1 Mine <br /> ing stations; <br /> • Data from two U. S. Geological Survey Station Flow Water Quality <br /> (USGS) continuous flow monitoring sta- Sylvester Gulch Continuous 3 times per year <br /> lions; USGS/WECC Gaging <br /> Station Continuous 3 times per year <br /> • Data from seasonal water quality sampling Fast Fork Minnesota <br /> at two Surface water quality monitoring Creek Flume Continuous 3 limes per year <br /> Lowcr Dry Fork Flume Continuous 3 limes per year <br /> stations; Upper Dry Fork Flume Continuous 3 times per year <br /> Lick Creek Flume Continuous 3 limes per year <br /> • Data from seasonal measurements of pH, North Fork Upper 3 times per year <br /> temperature, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, North Fork Lower 3 times per year <br /> and conductivity at the six stream gauging USGS North Fork <br /> gaging station <br /> stations in the Minnesota Creek Basin and <br /> near Somerset Continuous -- <br /> Sylvester Gulch; <br /> • Data from seasonal measurements of <br /> discharge and water quality sampling at Stilling wells at the five WECC gauges began <br /> seven springs issuing from or below the freezing in late November. By the end of Decem- <br /> "F' seam coal; ber all were frozen. By mid March all stilling wells <br /> had thawed. Debris buildup in the flumes was <br /> • Data from seasonal water level and water minimal during 1989 and no data were lost due to <br /> quality measurements at 19 wells; and debris. <br /> • <br /> 2 <br />