Laserfiche WebLink
• 2.0 HYDROLOGIC DATA INTERPRETATION AND <br />IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE <br />PERMIT AND ADJACENT AREAS <br />n <br />f,.J <br /> <br />This section focuses on three areas during <br />the water year (WY). First, it analyzes the <br />hydrologic data gathered. Second, it <br />assesses impacts of mining on the quality <br />and quantity of water in surface streams, <br />springs, groundwater aquifers, mine inflows, <br />and mine discharges. Lastly, it estimates <br />potential impacts of mining on these waters. <br />Data from the Colorado Agricultural <br />Experimental Station and College of <br />Engineering, Colorado State University <br />indicates that WY 1995 precipitation was <br />150% of the 1961 to 1990 average. Early <br />snowfalls at the first of the WY were <br />followed by a mild winter, a wet spring, <br />while temperatures well above average <br />closed the WY. Precipitation levels can <br />affect surface water and spring flow rate. It <br />also has the potential to influence mine <br />water inflows in areas of low overburden <br />cover (e.g., Sylvester Gulch). <br />2.1 ASSESSMENT OF MINE <br />WATER <br />The underground mining methods in use at <br />the West Elk Mine can affect groundwater <br />in essentially two ways. First, development <br />mining in areas where groundwater is pres- <br />ent in or near the coal seam can cause local- <br />ized movement of this water into the mine <br />workings. To date, groundwater movements <br />of this type have occurred in areas of low <br />cover which are highly fractured (near <br />outcrops and near stream channels) and <br />where sandstone channels bearing isolated <br />water immediately overlie the coal seam. <br />Secondly, retreat mining can cause subsi- <br />dence and the fracturing of overlying <br />groundwater formations. Again, water <br />Arta-95.210/03/ i Sl96(I :78pm1 <br />usually moves into the mine workings. At <br />the West Ells Mine, the permeability of the <br />"F" and "B" seams and strata of the Mesa <br />Verde Formation overlying the "F" seam <br />and located between the "F" and "B" seams <br />is very low, and the areal extent and <br />quantity of water stored in these units are <br />small. <br />During the WY, the mine workings located <br />neaz the outcrop, such as the Lone Pine <br />portal area, Gribble Gulch, the main portal <br />area, and along Sylvester Gulch behaved <br />similarly to previous years, relative to <br />inflows. Inflows occurred primazily from the <br />roof in areas of low overburden and neaz the <br />coal seam outcrop. The seasonal pattern of <br />mine inflows observed at the main portal <br />area and along Sylvester Gulch indicates that <br />the colluvium, coal, and bedrock aze <br />unconfined and recharge locally. The area <br />along Sylvester Gulch contains many natu- <br />rally occurring fractures. Water moves down <br />slope through the colluvium and fracture <br />zones and discharges as springs and seeps. <br />Water inflows appear to be controlled by the <br />amount of precipitation (mostly snowmelt), <br />depth of overburden, and location and extent <br />of fracture zones, and not by the extent of <br />the underground workings. <br />Mine water inflows for other areas of the <br />mine are related to site specific geologic and <br />topographic features as well as water-beaz- <br />ing formations. Mine activity is dewatering <br />the coal seam and local azeas of roof and <br />floor fractures during mining. Once initial <br />dewatering is complete, there appear to be <br />no sustained flows. There appear to be no <br />correlation with seasons or precipitation <br />events. Water levels in monitoring wells <br />15 RE~75ED 09R7l96 <br />