Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III • <br />999 <br />• <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: UOA 06G-3567 <br />FAX: (303) N32 8106 <br />August 12, 1999 <br />~~ <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />R E C L A M A 7 1 0 N <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />611 Owens <br />Governor <br />Allen S. Weaver <br />Mine Engineer crag E. bValche~ <br />E.ecuuve Director <br />Energy Fuels Mining Company Michael B. Long <br />P.O. Box 449 Division Diector <br />Florence, CO 81226 <br />RE: 1998 Annual Hydrology Report, Raton Creek Mine, Permit No. C-82-055 <br />Mr. Weaver: <br />The Division of Minerals and Geology has completed review of the 1998 Annual Hydrology <br />Report (AHR) for the Raton Creek Mine. <br />Review of the AHR file indicates that no response was received from Energy Fuels concerning <br />issues raised as a result of the 1997 Annual Hydrology Report review. Those questions are re- <br />stated below in Italics; <br />The hydrologic monitoring plan presented on page 522 of the approved permit requires <br />monthly visits with measurement of water level, temperature, pH, and E.C. for the Refuse <br />well and the luppa well. No information was presented in the 1997 repoR that indicates <br />monthly visits were conducted. Please submit this information or provide an explanation <br />for these omissions. <br />2. Who visits the sediment pond and the permanent diversion on a weekly basis to check <br />for, and measure, discharge and field parameters, if necessary? <br />Please respond to the above questions within 15 days within receipt of this letter. <br />1998 Annual Hydrology Report Review <br />Monitoring Frequency <br />The hydrologic monitoring plan presented on page 522 of the approved permit requires <br />monthly visits with measurement of water level, temperature, pH, and E.C. for the Refuse <br />well and the luppa well. All visits were conducted in accordance with the approved plan <br />with the exception of the March 1998 field sampling visit, where it appears from <br />inspection of the cumulative data for the wells that water level was measured but Feld <br />parameters were not collected. <br />2. Who visits the sediment pond and the permanent diversion on a weekly basis to check <br />for, and measure, discharge and field parameters, if discharge is observed? <br />