My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP25061
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP25061
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:56:47 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:07:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/13/1999
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO REVIEW OF THE 1997 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT RATON CREEK MINE FN C-82-055
From
ENERGY FUELS MINING CO
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
energy fuels mining company <br />iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />p. o. box 459 <br />Florence, Colorado 81 226 <br />September 3, 1999 <br />Mr. Kent A. Gorham <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />phone 1719) 784-6395 <br />fax (7191 7844352 <br />RECEIVED <br />SEP 131999 <br />Division of Minerals & Gedo9Y <br />RE: Response to Review of the 1997 Annual Hydrology Report <br />Raton Creek Mine, Your file No. C-82-055 <br />Dear Kent: <br />Following are EFMC's responses to the two questions raised by the Division from your <br />review of the 1997 AHR. <br />1. EFMC has reviewed its monitoring records for both the Iuppa and Refuse Wells for <br />the 1997 monitoring period. No additional monitoring data is available for the wells. Data for <br />the months omitted from the water quality tables shown in the AHR are either missing or was <br />not collected. <br />During some of emitted months, EFMC believes that no site visit was made, or that <br />no data was collected during site visits. This situation was discussed in-house and monthly <br />data collection was reestablished by the last quarter of the monitoring period. This monitoring <br />effort has persisted from then to now, as evidenced in the mine records. <br />2. EFMC has monitored the discharge quality on at least a monthly basis, if a discharge <br />is occurring, beginning in 1997 in accordance with the Wastewater Discharge Permit. A copy <br />of the page with monitoring requirements for Post-Mining Outfalls is attached for reference. <br />The permanent diversion has been monitored generally during peak flow events, and <br />flow events seldom occur. EFMC plans to revise the permit to specify no more than quarterly <br />monitoring of the permanent diversion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.