Laserfiche WebLink
. Species Diversity. The plant cover data collected at each cover sample transect yielded data <br />As described on page 780-84a of the Kerr Permit, the species diversity standard requires that at <br />the Marr Mine site, the reclaimed plant community shall be composed of at least four dominant <br />species comprising no more than 83 percent of the total relative percent cover and with no single <br />species contributing more than 40 percent of the total relative cover. At least one of the four <br />dominant plant species shall be either a shrub or a forb species. <br />relative to absolute and relative cover. These cover data were then converted into percent <br />composition or relative plant wver by species based upon the total amount of plant cover <br />encountered in each sample transect. The relative importance values of plants growing on the <br />reclaimed areas as outlined in the Permit, contain standards as to the number of perennial grass <br />species growing on the reclaimed areas to ensure that a monoculture of a single plant or a few <br />plants does not dominate the reclaimed areas. <br />As described on page 780-84b of the Kerr Permit, at the Kerr Tipple Area, the species diversity <br />standard is to luive at least three dominant species which must account for at least 54 percent and <br />no more than 75 percent of the relative plant cover. At least one of the three dominant species <br />shall be a forb and none of the three dominant plant species shall comprise less than three <br />percent of the relative plant cover. <br />Historical Data. To properly evaluate vegetation trends over time, we compared data <br />previously collected during the 1980 baseline period as found in the Ken Permit as well as <br />• previously collected revegetation monitoring data The Kea Permit data is referenced by the <br />Permit table number, while the data collected by Rocky Mountain Reclamation (RMR) in 1996 <br />entitled "1996 Vegetation Sampling for Interim Monitoring and Bond Release" is cited as the <br />RMR 1996 data Revegetation monitoring data collected in 1999 by ESCO and entitled "Report <br />of Findings -Reclamation Monitoring -Ken Mine -Jackson County, Colorado" was also <br />compared to our data These data will be referenced as the ESCO 1999 data These data are <br />included only to document historic trends and not in any way to satisfy any of the required bond <br />release vegetation sampling requirements. <br />Statistical Analysis of Data. As required by the Division's recently enacted regulations, it is not <br />necessary to achieve sample adequacy for reclamation monitoring corresponding to the Phase II <br />or Phase III bond release sampling efforts provided that the success standard has been achieved, <br />the reverse null hypothesis is used and a minimum number of transects have been sampled. If <br />sample adequacy is achieved, a minimum of a least 15 transects for cover and 30 transects for <br />production and shrub density must still be collected. Therefore, all of the data collected in this <br />evaluation were analyzed for sample adequacy in order to determine whether the Division's <br />requirements had been satisfied. The new sample adequacy formula contained in the revised <br />regulations was used, wherein a precision of 0.10 was used for cover and production and 0.15 for <br />shrub density. <br />On the reclaimed and reference areas sampled, all of the field data were analyzed in teens of <br />"total plant cover" to detemrine whether sample adequacy was achieved prior to leaving the site <br />being sampled. On the reclamation blocks and reference arras sampled for production, a <br />