My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP24903
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP24903
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:56:42 PM
Creation date
11/27/2007 4:05:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/28/2002
Doc Name
2001 AHR (Letter to Page 18)
From
Twentymile Coal Company
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2001
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. these deposits indicate that they aze usually Tess than 20 feet thick and the depth to Bound water is typically less <br />than 10 feet. The limited extent of the Foidel Creek alluvial deposits, and the lack of base flow in the creek <br />indicates that these deposits aze relatively insignificant to the area Bound water hydrologic system. <br />Alluvial deposits wntaining goundwater aze monitored in the Foidel Creek, Fish Creek, Trout Creek and Middle <br />Creek drainages. In the Foidel Creek drainage, sites both upstream and downstream of the TCC portals and <br />support facilities aze monitored. In the Fish Creek Drainage, sites upstream and downstream of the Mine 2 area <br />and the Fish Creek Borehole mine dewatering facilities aze monitored. <br />Foidel Creek Alluvial Groundwater: Duriug 2001, five Foidel Crcek alluvial wells, 009-5-10, 001-5-5, 008- <br />AV-2, FO-1, and FO-4, required monitoring for water levels and field pazameters on a monthly basis, and water <br />quality sampling on a quarterly basis. An additional well, 008-AV-1 required monthly monitoring only for water <br />levels and field parameters. All monitoring requirements were met at these sites. Tables 24 through 29 provide <br />summaries of the 2001 Water Yeaz data collected at each site. Tables 24a through 29a provide period of record <br />statistical summaries of collected data at each site. Figures 43 through 55 provide graphical representations of <br />water levels and selected water quality parameters recorded at each site. <br />Water levels during 2001 remained generally consistent with established ranges and patterns and showed the <br />typical seasonal variability of elevated water levels in the spring. Well 009-S-10 provides data for the alluvial <br />aquifer upgradient from the mine portals. Well 001-5-5 is located just downgradient form the mine portals and <br />• surface facilities location and is monitored in conjunction with surface water monitoring site 8. Figure 47 is <br />indicative of the general relationship between the alluvial goundwater elevations and surface water elevations at <br />these two sites. Site 8 exhibited an historic drop in water levels for 2001, going from about 6792 ft at the end of <br />2000 to about 6789 ft in 2001. Wells 008-AV-1 and 008-AV-2 are monitored in conjunction with surface water <br />site 304 at a point on Foidel Creek approximately 1000 feet upstream of the confluence of Foidel and Middle <br />Creeks. Water levels in these wells and the stream show the typical seasonal interrelationship of relatively rapid <br />increases and declines associated with spring nmoff (Figure 48). The longer-term trends in water levels at these <br />sites generally parallel the fluctuations observed in annual stream flows. Wells FO-1 and FO-4 are situated on <br />Foidel Creek approximately overlying the gateroads between the second and third panels mined in the EMD. <br />Typical seasonal fluctuations in water levels are depicted at these sites on figures 52 and 54. <br />Field conductivity measurements in general at wed 001-5-5 (average of 2223 in 2001) were again noted to be <br />higher than the upgradient site 009-5-10 (average of 1194 in 2001). Moving downgadient, field conductivities at <br />wells FOB and FO-1 averaged 2778 and 2742 respectively for 2001. Further downgradient, field wnduc$vities <br />at well 008-AV-2 are averaging 1707. Conductivity values at well 009-5-10 fluctuated within previously <br />established ranges during 2000. The generally increasing field conductivity (rend, noted in previous years for <br />well 001-5-5, appears to be continuing in the 2001 data. Field conductivity measurements at wells 008-AV-1 and <br />008-AV-2 aze comparable and occurred within previously established ranges for these sites. As indicated on <br />Figure 51, TDS concentrations at well 008-AV-2 continued a gentle upwazd trend. TCC will continue to monitor <br />. the direction of this trend. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.